Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGRFX vs RGAFX
AGRFX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts AGRFX vs RGAFX
AGRFX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGRFX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGRFX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. AGRFX (1.55B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than AGRFX: RGAFX (0.46) vs AGRFX (0.00). AGRFX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: AGRFX (36 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). AGRFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). AGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGRFX: RGAFX (250) vs AGRFX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.93 vs. AGRFX (-2.23). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.51 vs. AGRFX (-0.59).
| AGRFX | RGAFX | AGRFX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.34 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.34 | 324% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.910 | 3.768 | 130% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.23 | 5.93 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.74 | 45.35 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.59 | 16.51 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.00 | 104.91 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers