Ad is loading...
AGTHX vs NWCAX
AGTHX vs NWCAX Comparison
Open Charts AGTHX vs NWCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer A
Price$72.66
Change+$0.54 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$52.85
Change+$0.33 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets831.3M
AGTHX vs NWCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGTHX vs. NWCAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGTHX is a StrongBuy and NWCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGTHX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. NWCAX (831M). AGTHX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: AGTHX (0.40) vs NWCAX (0.00). AGTHX was incepted earlier than NWCAX: AGTHX (51 years) vs NWCAX (16 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than AGTHX (0.61). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. AGTHX (25.00). AGTHX (6%) and NWCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. AGTHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: AGTHX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). AGTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.94 vs. NWCAX (-6.03). AGTHX return over 5 years is better than : 43.77 vs. NWCAX (30.03).
| AGTHX | NWCAX | AGTHX / NWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.90 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.08 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 51 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.143 | -6.030 | 52% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 831M | 34,176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.94 | -6.03 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.41 | 28.82 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.77 | 30.03 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.06 | 16.97 | 360% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...