Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGTHX vs NWCAX
AGTHX vs NWCAX Comparison
Open Charts AGTHX vs NWCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer A
Price$83.54
Change-$0.13 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.14B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$60.35
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets894.99M
AGTHX vs NWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGTHX vs. NWCAX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGTHX is a StrongBuy and NWCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGTHX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. NWCAX (895M). AGTHX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: AGTHX (0.35) vs NWCAX (0.00). AGTHX was incepted earlier than NWCAX: AGTHX (52 years) vs NWCAX (16 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than AGTHX (0.61). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. AGTHX (25.00). AGTHX (6%) and NWCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. AGTHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: AGTHX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). AGTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.48 vs. NWCAX (1.04). AGTHX return over 5 years is better than : 46.78 vs. NWCAX (31.60).
| AGTHX | NWCAX | AGTHX / NWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.90 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.08 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.194 | 7.980 | 153% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 895M | 36,313% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.48 | 1.04 | 1,298% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.85 | 44.65 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.78 | 31.60 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.80 | 26.52 | 316% |