Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGTHX vs NWCAX
AGTHX vs NWCAX Comparison
Open Charts AGTHX vs NWCAX
AGTHX vs NWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGTHX vs. NWCAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGTHX is a Buy and NWCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGTHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NWCAX (918M). AGTHX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: AGTHX (0.25) vs NWCAX (0.00). AGTHX was incepted earlier than NWCAX: AGTHX (53 years) vs NWCAX (17 years). NWCAX (1.03) is less costly to investors than AGTHX (0.59). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. AGTHX (32.00). AGTHX (6%) and NWCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. AGTHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: AGTHX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). AGTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. NWCAX (-14.56). AGTHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.61 vs. NWCAX (-15.68).
| AGTHX | NWCAX | AGTHX / NWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.90 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.03 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.085 | 4.554 | 200% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 918M | 38,453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | -14.56 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.29 | 12.83 | 337% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.61 | -15.68 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.66 | 33.66 | 320% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers