Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGTHX vs NWCFX
AGTHX vs NWCFX Comparison
Open Charts AGTHX vs NWCFX
AGTHX vs NWCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGTHX vs. NWCFX commentary
Jul 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGTHX is a Buy and NWCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGTHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NWCFX (966M). AGTHX pays higher dividends than NWCFX: AGTHX (0.25) vs NWCFX (0.00). AGTHX was incepted earlier than NWCFX: AGTHX (53 years) vs NWCFX (13 years). NWCFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than AGTHX (0.59). NWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. AGTHX (32.00). AGTHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCFX: AGTHX (250) vs NWCFX (1000000). AGTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.66 vs. NWCFX (-6.24). AGTHX return over 5 years is better than : 17.42 vs. NWCFX (-0.87).
| AGTHX | NWCFX | AGTHX / NWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.54 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.886 | 8.329 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357B | 966M | 36,957% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.66 | -6.24 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.73 | 26.10 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.42 | -0.87 | -2,012% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.72 | 55.95 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers