Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGWRX vs GFACX
AGWRX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts AGWRX vs GFACX
AGWRX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGWRX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGWRX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. AGWRX (14.5B). AGWRX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . AGWRX was incepted earlier than GFACX: AGWRX (23 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) and AGWRX (1.33) have similar cost to investors . AGWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGWRX: GFACX (250) vs AGWRX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. AGWRX (-10.38). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.85 vs. AGWRX (-0.62).
| AGWRX | GFACX | AGWRX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.35 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.35 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.775 | 8.529 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 353B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.38 | -2.39 | 434% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.79 | 34.46 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.62 | 3.85 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.49 | 82.33 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement