Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGWRX vs GFAFX
AGWRX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts AGWRX vs GFAFX
AGWRX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGWRX vs. GFAFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGWRX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. AGWRX (14.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than AGWRX: GFAFX (0.20) vs AGWRX (0.00). AGWRX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: AGWRX (23 years) vs GFAFX (26 years). AGWRX (1.33) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). AGWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGWRX: GFAFX (250) vs AGWRX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.02 vs. AGWRX (-10.38). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. AGWRX (-0.62).
| AGWRX | GFAFX | AGWRX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.65 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.65 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.775 | 9.043 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 353B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.38 | 0.02 | -42,511% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.79 | 42.74 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.62 | 13.04 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.49 | 106.25 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement