Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGWRX vs GFAFX
AGWRX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts AGWRX vs GFAFX
AGWRX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGWRX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGWRX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. AGWRX (15.1B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than AGWRX: GFAFX (0.20) vs AGWRX (0.00). AGWRX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: AGWRX (23 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). AGWRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). AGWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGWRX: GFAFX (250) vs AGWRX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. AGWRX (-3.45). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.83 vs. AGWRX (2.63).
| AGWRX | GFAFX | AGWRX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.65 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.65 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.040 | 8.855 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.1B | 357B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.45 | 5.49 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.44 | 44.18 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.63 | 16.83 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.01 | 106.28 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement