It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGYS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLQWDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGYS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
AGYS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while LQWDF (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
AGYS is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
AGYS | LQWDF | AGYS / LQWDF | |
Capitalization | 2.31B | 2.93M | 78,623% |
EBITDA | 23.5M | -899.86K | -2,612% |
Gain YTD | 42.879 | 199.652 | 21% |
P/E Ratio | 26.19 | 9.25 | 283% |
Revenue | 228M | 4.88K | 4,674,047% |
Total Cash | 116M | 187K | 62,032% |
Total Debt | 24.1M | 118K | 20,424% |
AGYS | LQWDF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AGYS's Valuation (69) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as LQWDF (96) in the null industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew similarly to LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.
AGYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for LQWDF (100) in the null industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew significantly faster than LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.
AGYS's SMR Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for LQWDF (92) in the null industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew significantly faster than LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.
LQWDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as AGYS (45) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to AGYS’s over the last 12 months.
LQWDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AGYS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to AGYS’s over the last 12 months.
AGYS | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FVDKX | 38.23 | -0.05 | -0.13% |
Fidelity Value Discovery K | |||
MFLLX | 14.36 | -0.06 | -0.42% |
Morgan Stanley Inst Inception R6 | |||
VEOIX | 20.57 | -0.18 | -0.87% |
Vanguard Global Environmental Opp StkInv | |||
GTTTX | 42.86 | -0.45 | -1.04% |
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts Inv | |||
MFEKX | 223.48 | -4.97 | -2.18% |
MFS Growth R6 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGYS has been loosely correlated with TREIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGYS jumps, then TREIF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AGYS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AGYS | 100% | +0.29% | ||
TREIF - AGYS | 45% Loosely correlated | -6.46% | ||
NATL - AGYS | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
SPSC - AGYS | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
DJCO - AGYS | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
PAR - AGYS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LQWDF has been loosely correlated with BMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LQWDF jumps, then BMR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LQWDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LQWDF | 100% | +1.15% | ||
BMR - LQWDF | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
AGYS - LQWDF | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
RTNXF - LQWDF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LSPKF - LQWDF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TREIF - LQWDF | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.46% | ||
More |