AGYS
Price
$90.64
Change
-$1.14 (-1.24%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.55B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QTWO
Price
$43.89
Change
+$0.57 (+1.32%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.75B
51 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGYS vs QTWO

Header iconAGYS vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts AGYS vs QTWOBanner chart's image
AGYS vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGYS vs. QTWO commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGYS is a StrongBuy and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (AGYS: $90.64 vs. QTWO: $43.89)
Brand notoriety: AGYS and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGYS: 102% vs. QTWO: 54%
Market capitalization -- AGYS: $2.55B vs. QTWO: $2.75B
AGYS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.55B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGYS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AGYS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AGYS is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGYS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AGYS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AGYS is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

AGYS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.39% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

AGYS is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.27% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($2.75B) has a higher market cap than AGYS($2.55B). AGYS has higher P/E ratio than QTWO: AGYS (66.16) vs QTWO (38.84). AGYS YTD gains are higher at: -23.729 vs. QTWO (-39.177). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 136M vs. AGYS (59.2M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 379M vs. AGYS (117M). AGYS has less debt than QTWO: AGYS (19M) vs QTWO (344M). QTWO has higher revenues than AGYS: QTWO (822M) vs AGYS (319M).
AGYSQTWOAGYS / QTWO
Capitalization2.55B2.75B93%
EBITDA59.2M136M44%
Gain YTD-23.729-39.17761%
P/E Ratio66.1638.84170%
Revenue319M822M39%
Total Cash117M379M31%
Total Debt19M344M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGYS vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
AGYS
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4576
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68100
SMR RATING
1..100
6363
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4277
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (61) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as AGYS (83) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to AGYS’s over the last 12 months.

AGYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

AGYS's SMR Rating (63) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (63) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

AGYS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (77) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

AGYS's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGYSQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGYS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLCE30.750.15
+0.48%
Frontier Asset U.S. Large-Cap Equity ETF
JANT43.670.13
+0.31%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Jan ETF
PICB23.43N/A
N/A
Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF
BHYB54.21N/A
N/A
Xtrackers USD High Yld BB-B ex Fin ETF
LULG6.71-0.37
-5.23%
Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF

AGYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGYS has been loosely correlated with MANH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGYS jumps, then MANH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGYS
1D Price
Change %
AGYS100%
-1.24%
MANH - AGYS
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
QTWO - AGYS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
BL - AGYS
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
CXM - AGYS
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
SPT - AGYS
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
More