Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHGCX vs FSMAX
AHGCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AHGCX vs FSMAX
AHGCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHGCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHGCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. AHGCX (5.31B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AHGCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs AHGCX (0.00). AHGCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AHGCX (25 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). AHGCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHGCX: FSMAX (0) vs AHGCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. AHGCX (-45.49). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. AHGCX (-64.08).
| AHGCX | FSMAX | AHGCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.04 | 5,714% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.04 | 5,714% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.245 | 13.370 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.31B | 40.1B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -45.49 | 20.57 | -221% |
| Returns for 3 years | -45.03 | 55.83 | -81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -64.08 | 33.18 | -193% |
| Returns for 10 years | -66.27 | 133.82 | -50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement