Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHGCX vs FSMAX
AHGCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AHGCX vs FSMAX
AHGCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHGCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHGCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. AHGCX (5.59B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AHGCX: FSMAX (0.48) vs AHGCX (0.00). AHGCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AHGCX (25 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). AHGCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHGCX: FSMAX (0) vs AHGCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. AHGCX (-41.62). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. AHGCX (-60.96).
| AHGCX | FSMAX | AHGCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.04 | 5,714% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.04 | 5,714% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.081 | 15.913 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.59B | 43.5B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -41.62 | 24.38 | -171% |
| Returns for 3 years | -42.11 | 63.28 | -67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -60.96 | 39.12 | -156% |
| Returns for 10 years | -64.83 | 139.20 | -47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers