Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHGCX vs FSMAX
AHGCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AHGCX vs FSMAX
AHGCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHGCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHGCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. AHGCX (5.46B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AHGCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs AHGCX (0.00). AHGCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AHGCX (25 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). AHGCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHGCX: FSMAX (0) vs AHGCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. AHGCX (-41.93). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. AHGCX (-61.92).
| AHGCX | FSMAX | AHGCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.04 | 5,714% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.04 | 5,714% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.218 | 16.937 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.46B | 40.1B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -41.93 | 23.68 | -177% |
| Returns for 3 years | -39.17 | 72.74 | -54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -61.92 | 40.14 | -154% |
| Returns for 10 years | -65.93 | 134.49 | -49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement