Advertisement
AHL vs ALL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHL is a Hold and ALL is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileALL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ALL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AHL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ALL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AHL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- ALL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AHL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.05% price change this week, while ALL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
AHL is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.
ALL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.88% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| AHL | ALL | AHL / ALL | |
| Capitalization | 3.37B | 56B | 6% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | N/A | 11.780 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 6.05 | 9.99 | 61% |
| Revenue | 3.16B | 66.2B | 5% |
| Total Cash | 6.21B | 10.6B | 59% |
| Total Debt | 367M | 8.09B | 5% |
AHL | ALL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 33 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ALL's Valuation (60) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (69). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.
ALL's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHL (100). This means that ALL’s stock grew significantly faster than AHL’s over the last 12 months.
AHL's SMR Rating (77) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (95). This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.
ALL's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (52). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.
AHL's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALL (91). This means that AHL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALL’s over the last 12 months.
| AHL | ALL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 39% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 51% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EWY | 84.19 | 0.84 | +1.01% |
| iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | |||
| BGY | 5.92 | 0.02 | +0.34% |
| BlackRock Enhanced International Dividend Trust | |||
| QLV | 72.38 | 0.23 | +0.33% |
| FlexShares US Quality Low Vol ETF | |||
| LFAZ | 163.72 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2062 Longevity Income ETF | |||
| NOM | 10.95 | -0.05 | -0.45% |
| Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
AHL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AHL and CB have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHL and CB's prices will move in lockstep.