Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHMFX vs NSAOX
AHMFX vs NSAOX Comparison
Open Charts AHMFX vs NSAOX
American High-Income Municipal Bond F-2
Price$15.24
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.83B
Nuveen Strategic Municipal Opps A
Price$9.82
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
AHMFX vs NSAOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHMFX vs. NSAOX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHMFX is a Hold and NSAOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. NSAOX (1.06B). AHMFX (4.25) and NSAOX (4.25) have matching dividends . AHMFX was incepted earlier than NSAOX: AHMFX (17 years) vs NSAOX (11 years). NSAOX (0.84) is less costly to investors than AHMFX (0.43). NSAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. AHMFX (42.00). AHMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSAOX: AHMFX (250) vs NSAOX (2500). NSAOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.35 vs. AHMFX (-1.76). NSAOX return over 5 years is better than : 4.96 vs. AHMFX (-4.03).
| AHMFX | NSAOX | AHMFX / NSAOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.84 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.84 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.327 | 1.712 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.8B | 1.06B | 1,210% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.25 | 4.25 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.76 | 1.35 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.08 | 15.33 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.03 | 4.96 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.73 | 24.62 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement