Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSCX vs FSPHX
AHSCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. AHSCX (62.2M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs AHSCX (0.00). AHSCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSCX (23 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). AHSCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). AHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.38 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.02 vs. AHSCX (-13.90). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -19.49 vs. AHSCX (-52.93).
| AHSCX | FSPHX | AHSCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.63 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.63 | 302% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.754 | -7.670 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.2M | 5.74B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.90 | -13.02 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.04 | -10.77 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | -52.93 | -19.49 | 272% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.02 | 5.32 | -921% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement