Ad is loading...
AHSCX vs FSPHX
AHSCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. AHSCX (66.9M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs AHSCX (0.00). AHSCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSCX (23 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). AHSCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). AHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.38 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.80 vs. AHSCX (-15.37). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.01 vs. AHSCX (-46.73).
| AHSCX | FSPHX | AHSCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.65 | 292% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.65 | 292% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.380 | -7.083 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.9M | 6.42B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.37 | -10.80 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.02 | -7.54 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | -46.73 | -10.01 | 467% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.44 | 8.24 | -552% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...