Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSCX vs FSPHX
AHSCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. AHSCX (65.9M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs AHSCX (0.00). AHSCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSCX (24 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). AHSCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). AHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.38 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSCX (1000). AHSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.90 vs. FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -8.84 vs. AHSCX (-46.80).
| AHSCX | FSPHX | AHSCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.63 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.63 | 302% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.399 | 10.532 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.9M | 6.22B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.90 | 0.02 | 17,173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.56 | 10.47 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -46.80 | -8.84 | 529% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.77 | 39.34 | -73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement