Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSCX vs FSPHX
AHSCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts AHSCX vs FSPHX
AHSCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSCX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. AHSCX (81.6M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSCX: FSPHX (0.39) vs AHSCX (0.00). AHSCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSCX (24 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). AHSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). AHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 289.28 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSCX (1000). AHSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.10 vs. FSPHX (7.98). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -15.10 vs. AHSCX (-34.49).
| AHSCX | FSPHX | AHSCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.62 | 316% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.62 | 316% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.212 | 1.735 | 1,396% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.6M | 6.75B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.10 | 7.98 | 565% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.90 | 5.87 | 713% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.49 | -15.10 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.00 | 43.51 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement