Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSCX vs FSPHX
AHSCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts AHSCX vs FSPHX
AHSCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSCX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. AHSCX (62.1M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSCX: FSPHX (0.45) vs AHSCX (0.00). AHSCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSCX (24 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). AHSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). AHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 289.28 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSCX (1000). AHSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.18 vs. FSPHX (0.76). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -23.99 vs. AHSCX (-40.57).
| AHSCX | FSPHX | AHSCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.62 | 316% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.62 | 316% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.582 | -11.527 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.1M | 5.78B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.18 | 0.76 | 3,579% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.92 | -10.88 | -110% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.57 | -23.99 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.49 | 37.35 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement