Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSCX vs FSPHX
AHSCX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts AHSCX vs FSPHX
AHSCX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSCX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSCX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. AHSCX (88.5M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSCX: FSPHX (0.42) vs AHSCX (0.00). AHSCX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSCX (24 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). AHSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). AHSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 289.28 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSCX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSCX (1000). AHSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.79 vs. FSPHX (14.59). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.56 vs. AHSCX (-26.87).
| AHSCX | FSPHX | AHSCX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.62 | 316% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.62 | 316% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.017 | 5.675 | 547% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.5M | 6.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.79 | 14.59 | 382% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.22 | 10.34 | 466% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.87 | -10.56 | 254% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.19 | 46.08 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement