Ad is loading...
AHSZX vs FSPHX
AHSZX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSZX vs. FSPHX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSZX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. AHSZX (67.2M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSZX: FSPHX (0.02) vs AHSZX (0.00). AHSZX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSZX (10 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). AHSZX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). AHSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.38 vs. FSPHX (46.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSZX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSZX (500000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.31 vs. AHSZX (-13.48). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -7.06 vs. AHSZX (-32.68).
| AHSZX | FSPHX | AHSZX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.65 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.65 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.117 | -5.798 | 226% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.2M | 6.42B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.48 | -8.31 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.62 | -9.31 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.68 | -7.06 | 463% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers