Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHSZX vs FSPHX
AHSZX vs FSPHX Comparison
Open Charts AHSZX vs FSPHX
AHSZX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHSZX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHSZX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. AHSZX (88.5M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than AHSZX: FSPHX (0.42) vs AHSZX (0.00). AHSZX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: AHSZX (11 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). AHSZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.62). AHSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 289.28 vs. FSPHX (69.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AHSZX: FSPHX (0) vs AHSZX (500000). AHSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.61 vs. FSPHX (14.59). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.56 vs. AHSZX (-12.41).
| AHSZX | FSPHX | AHSZX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.62 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.62 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.015 | 5.675 | 564% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.5M | 6.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.61 | 14.59 | 395% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.48 | 10.34 | 517% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.41 | -10.56 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.74 | 46.08 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement