AIA
Price
$139.88
Change
+$0.91 (+0.65%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
5.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BBAX
Price
$59.61
Change
-$0.16 (-0.27%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
6.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIA vs BBAX

AIA vs BBAX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) vs. JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) tracks a concentrated index of 50 large-cap equities primarily from Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore, resulting in a pronounced tilt toward information technology.
  • JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) follows a broader market-cap-weighted index of large- and mid-cap stocks across developed Asia-Pacific markets excluding Japan, with significantly greater exposure to financials and materials sectors.
  • AIA carries a higher expense ratio of 0.50% compared with BBAX’s 0.19%, reflecting differences in index methodology and portfolio concentration.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and provide equity exposure to Asia ex-Japan, yet they differ materially in geographic focus, sector allocation, and diversification levels.
  • AIA’s concentrated structure may amplify volatility tied to technology and semiconductor cycles, while BBAX’s broader holdings offer more balanced exposure to financial services and resource companies.
  • Structural characteristics such as number of holdings, sector weights, and cost efficiency are key differentiators for long-term positioning within Asia-Pacific equity allocations.

Introduction

Investors seeking targeted exposure to developed and advanced Asian equity markets outside Japan frequently evaluate iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX). These two exchange-traded funds do not compete directly but instead represent alternative strategies within the same broad geographic mandate. AIA delivers concentrated large-cap exposure with a technology emphasis, while BBAX provides broader diversification across developed Asia-Pacific economies. Comparing their index methodologies, holdings profiles, cost structures, and sector exposures helps investors align selections with specific risk tolerances and thematic preferences in the current market environment.

iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) Overview

iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) seeks to track the S&P Asia 50 Index, which comprises 50 of the largest Asian equities outside Japan. The fund holds approximately 53 securities, with the top 10 holdings representing roughly 67% of assets. Sector allocations are heavily weighted toward information technology (approximately 57–61%), followed by financials (17–19%) and consumer discretionary (9–10%). The expense ratio stands at 0.50%. As a passive, market-capitalization-weighted strategy, AIA rebalances periodically in line with index changes. Its distinguishing feature is the narrow focus on four primary markets—Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore—producing elevated concentration risk and a pronounced technology tilt.

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) Overview

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) seeks to track the Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index. The fund typically holds around 100–105 large- and mid-cap securities across developed Asia-Pacific markets excluding Japan. Sector allocations emphasize financials (approximately 40–53%) and materials (15–16%), with smaller weights in real estate, industrials, and other areas. The expense ratio is 0.19%. BBAX employs a passive, float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted approach with periodic rebalancing. Its broader geographic scope, including notable allocations to Australia, Hong Kong, and Singapore, distinguishes it from more concentrated peers and supports greater diversification across financial services and resource-related companies.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the Asia-Pacific equity universe excluding Japan, a region influenced by semiconductor supply chains, regional trade dynamics, monetary policy divergence, and commodity price fluctuations. Capital flows into developed Asian markets have remained resilient amid global growth differentials, while regulatory developments in technology and financial services continue to shape sector leadership. Macroeconomic drivers such as interest-rate expectations and currency movements affect valuations across both funds, with technology exporters and financial institutions exhibiting varying sensitivity to these factors. Sector risks include geopolitical tensions and shifts in global demand for electronics and raw materials.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has demonstrated higher sensitivity to technology sector rotations and semiconductor earnings trends due to its concentrated holdings. JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) has shown relatively steadier behavior tied to financial sector performance and resource company results. Differences in volatility profiles stem from AIA’s narrower geographic and sector focus versus BBAX’s broader developed-market diversification. Relative positioning reflects contrasting exposures to interest-rate-sensitive financials and growth-oriented technology names, allowing investors to calibrate allocations according to prevailing macroeconomic conditions and sector momentum.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX). The lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 100 holdings, and balanced exposure to financials and materials sectors provide a more resilient profile across varying market regimes compared with the higher-cost, concentrated technology tilt of iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). This assessment rests on cost efficiency, diversification metrics, and sector momentum consistency rather than short-term price movements.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AIA vs. BBAX commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIA is a Hold and BBAX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBAX has more net assets: 6.23B vs. AIA (5.1B). AIA has a higher annual dividend yield than BBAX: AIA (43.979) vs BBAX (7.664). AIA was incepted earlier than BBAX: AIA (19 years) vs BBAX (8 years). BBAX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than AIA (0.50). AIA has a higher turnover BBAX (4.00) vs BBAX (4.00).
AIABBAXAIA / BBAX
Gain YTD43.9797.664574%
Net Assets5.1B6.23B82%
Total Expense Ratio0.500.19263%
Turnover25.004.00625%
Yield1.093.5731%
Fund Existence19 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIABBAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BBAX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLQS48.050.60
+1.26%
Franklin US Small Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
VIOV115.041.09
+0.96%
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
YQQQ10.060.05
+0.53%
YieldMax Short N100 Option Inc Strgy ETF
MUNX25.12N/A
N/A
AMG GW&K Muni Income ETF
BJUN48.09-0.05
-0.10%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - June

BBAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBAX has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBAX jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBAX
1D Price
Change %
BBAX100%
-0.28%
BHP - BBAX
72%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
RIO - BBAX
68%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
BEN - BBAX
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.91%
IAG - BBAX
54%
Loosely correlated
-5.87%
CSL - BBAX
45%
Loosely correlated
+7.27%
More