AIA
Price
$140.96
Change
+$0.76 (+0.54%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Net Assets
5.15B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MINV
Price
$53.55
Change
-$0.17 (-0.32%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Net Assets
171.52M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIA vs MINV

Header iconAIA vs MINV Comparison
Open Charts AIA vs MINVBanner chart's image
AIA vs MINV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) vs. Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV)

Key Takeaways

  • AIA is a passive ETF tracking the S&P Asia 50 Capped Index, offering exposure to approximately 50 of the largest equities across developed Asian markets including Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore.
  • MINV is an actively managed ETF focused on innovative growth companies in Asia, with a higher expense ratio and a more concentrated thematic approach to technology and innovation-driven firms.
  • AIA features a lower expense ratio of 0.50% compared to MINV’s 0.79%, providing a cost advantage for long-term investors seeking broad large-cap Asian exposure.
  • Both ETFs emphasize Asian equities but differ in strategy: AIA prioritizes scale and liquidity through index replication, while MINV employs active stock selection for potential outperformance in innovation sectors.
  • AIA typically holds 50–70 securities with heavy weighting toward established leaders in semiconductors and consumer electronics, whereas MINV maintains a similar number of holdings but tilts toward emerging innovators.
  • Relative positioning favors AIA for broad diversification and cost efficiency, while MINV suits investors seeking active management in high-growth Asian themes.

Introduction

Investors seeking Asian equity exposure often compare large-cap index products with active thematic strategies. The iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) both target the region but pursue distinct approaches. AIA delivers passive access to leading companies, while MINV actively selects innovators. These ETFs do not compete directly yet serve complementary roles for portfolios aiming to capture Asia’s economic growth through either broad market representation or focused thematic bets.

iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) Overview

The iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) is a passive fund that seeks to track the S&P Asia 50 Capped Index. It provides exposure to approximately 50 of the largest Asian companies, primarily from Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore. The ETF typically holds between 50 and 70 securities, with top holdings including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Samsung Electronics, Tencent Holdings, Alibaba Group, and SK Hynix. Sector allocations concentrate in technology, financials, and consumer discretionary. Its expense ratio stands at 0.50%. The fund employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment. As a standard equity ETF, it offers high liquidity and straightforward structure for international diversification.

Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) Overview

The Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) is an actively managed fund that invests at least 80% of assets in companies across Asia considered innovative or growth-oriented. It holds approximately 50 to 70 positions, with top holdings often including Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, and other technology and electronics firms. The strategy emphasizes fundamental analysis to identify firms driving innovation in sectors such as technology and consumer-related industries. Its expense ratio is 0.79%. Unlike index-based products, MINV features discretionary stock selection and does not follow a rigid benchmark, allowing flexibility in response to market conditions while maintaining a focus on long-term capital appreciation.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader Asia ex-Japan equity market, where technology and semiconductor supply chains remain central drivers. Macroeconomic factors including global demand for electronics, regional trade dynamics, and capital expenditure cycles in manufacturing influence performance. Regulatory developments in key markets such as data privacy, export controls on advanced chips, and domestic innovation policies continue to shape opportunities. Sector risks include geopolitical tensions, currency fluctuations, and shifts in global supply chains. Capital flows into Asian equities often accelerate during periods of easing monetary policy or improving corporate earnings visibility in the technology sector.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, AIA has provided steady exposure aligned with large-cap Asian benchmarks, benefiting from the scale and stability of its holdings during periods of sector rotation toward established technology leaders. MINV’s active approach has allowed it to adjust toward higher-growth innovators, potentially amplifying returns during innovation-driven rallies while introducing greater volatility tied to stock-specific outcomes. Relative positioning highlights AIA’s lower-cost, diversified profile versus MINV’s higher-cost thematic tilt. Both have responded to earnings cycles in semiconductors and broader macro shifts in interest rates and commodity trends, with AIA demonstrating more consistent benchmark tracking and MINV showing variability from active decisions.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore opportunities in Asian equities and other sectors.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to the iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). Its lower expense ratio, passive replication of a liquid large-cap index, and broader diversification profile provide a more efficient and lower-risk framework for Asia exposure compared with the higher-cost active strategy of MINV. Investors focused on cost efficiency and benchmark consistency may find AIA better positioned, while those seeking active innovation exposure could consider MINV as a complementary allocation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AIA vs. MINV commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIA is a Hold and MINV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIA has more net assets: 5.15B vs. MINV (172M). MINV has a higher annual dividend yield than AIA: MINV (51.666) vs AIA (44.561). AIA was incepted earlier than MINV: AIA (19 years) vs MINV (4 years). AIA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than MINV (0.79). MINV has a higher turnover AIA (25.00) vs AIA (25.00).
AIAMINVAIA / MINV
Gain YTD44.56151.66686%
Net Assets5.15B172M2,992%
Total Expense Ratio0.500.7963%
Turnover25.00101.9525%
Yield1.090.94116%
Fund Existence19 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIAMINV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MINV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GAL53.230.14
+0.26%
State Street® Global Allocation ETF
CSHP99.440.03
+0.03%
iShares Enhanced ST Bond Active ETF
AGRW31.33-0.02
-0.08%
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF
NAC12.01-0.05
-0.41%
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
USL50.86-1.22
-2.34%
United States 12 Month Oil

MINV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MINV has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MINV jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MINV
1D Price
Change %
MINV100%
-0.32%
LRCX - MINV
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
ASML - MINV
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
NVDA - MINV
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
AVGO - MINV
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
SE - MINV
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.21%
More