AIAGF vs MLI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIAGF is a Hold and MLI is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIAGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AIAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MLI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MLI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MLI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AIAGF (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLI (@Metal Fabrication) price change was +3.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
MLI is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Metal Fabrication (+0.05% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| AIAGF | MLI | AIAGF / MLI | |
| Capitalization | 3.18B | 8.4B | 38% |
| EBITDA | 709M | 831M | 85% |
| Gain YTD | -15.661 | 58.591 | -27% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.53 | 15.34 | 49% |
| Revenue | 17B | 3.4B | 500% |
| Total Cash | 69M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 283M | 35.2M | 804% |
AIAGF | MLI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AIAGF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as MLI (36) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that AIAGF’s stock grew similarly to MLI’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIAGF (45) in the null industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIAGF’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's SMR Rating (40) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIAGF (75) in the null industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIAGF’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as AIAGF (60) in the null industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew similarly to AIAGF’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIAGF (97) in the null industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew significantly faster than AIAGF’s over the last 12 months.
| MLI | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
AIAGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AIAGF and MEC have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIAGF and MEC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AIAGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIAGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MEC - AIAGF | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
| MLI - AIAGF | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
| TG - AIAGF | 10% Poorly correlated | +10.97% | ||
| PRLB - AIAGF | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
| WOR - AIAGF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
More | ||||