AIAGF
Price
$87.20
Change
+$1.71 (+2.00%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
MLI
Price
$88.72
Change
+$0.42 (+0.48%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.82B
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIAGF vs MLI

Header iconAIAGF vs MLI Comparison
Open Charts AIAGF vs MLIBanner chart's image
Aurubis Ag
Price$87.20
Change+$1.71 (+2.00%)
Volume$3.77K
Capitalization4.8B
Mueller Industries
Price$88.72
Change+$0.42 (+0.48%)
Volume$877.21K
Capitalization9.82B
AIAGF vs MLI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIAGF vs. MLI commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIAGF is a Hold and MLI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AIAGF: $87.20 vs. MLI: $88.72)
Brand notoriety: AIAGF and MLI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Metal Fabrication industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIAGF: 112% vs. MLI: 65%
Market capitalization -- AIAGF: $4.8B vs. MLI: $9.82B
AIAGF [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $4.8B. MLI’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $9.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIAGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AIAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLI is a better buy in the long-term than AIAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIAGF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLI’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIAGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MLI’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLI is a better buy in the short-term than AIAGF.

Price Growth

AIAGF (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLI (@Metal Fabrication) price change was +5.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +3.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLI is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (+3.83% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLI($9.82B) has a higher market cap than AIAGF($4.8B). MLI has higher P/E ratio than AIAGF: MLI (14.10) vs AIAGF (4.66). MLI YTD gains are higher at: 12.517 vs. AIAGF (10.365). AIAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.16B vs. MLI (892M). MLI has more cash in the bank: 874M vs. AIAGF (490M). MLI has less debt than AIAGF: MLI (32.9M) vs AIAGF (579M). AIAGF has higher revenues than MLI: AIAGF (18.1B) vs MLI (3.92B).
AIAGFMLIAIAGF / MLI
Capitalization4.8B9.82B49%
EBITDA1.16B892M130%
Gain YTD10.36512.51783%
P/E Ratio4.6614.1033%
Revenue18.1B3.92B462%
Total Cash490M874M56%
Total Debt579M32.9M1,760%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIAGF vs MLI: Fundamental Ratings
AIAGF
MLI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5047
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4210
SMR RATING
1..100
5440
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9954
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AIAGF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as MLI (35) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that AIAGF’s stock grew similarly to MLI’s over the last 12 months.

MLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as AIAGF (42) in the null industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew similarly to AIAGF’s over the last 12 months.

MLI's SMR Rating (40) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as AIAGF (54) in the null industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew similarly to AIAGF’s over the last 12 months.

MLI's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as AIAGF (55) in the null industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew similarly to AIAGF’s over the last 12 months.

MLI's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIAGF (99) in the null industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIAGFMLI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRSMX75.320.90
+1.21%
Hood River Small-Cap Growth Instl
MUOAX31.900.17
+0.54%
Morgan Stanley Instl US Core A
TPYAX9.380.03
+0.32%
Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq A
DIEQX39.230.10
+0.26%
Domini Impact Equity Institutional
AEPCX58.83-0.31
-0.52%
American Funds EUPAC C

AIAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIAGF and MEC have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIAGF and MEC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIAGF
1D Price
Change %
AIAGF100%
N/A
MEC - AIAGF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
MLI - AIAGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
NWPX - AIAGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
IIIN - AIAGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
TG - AIAGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
More

MLI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLI has been loosely correlated with ESAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLI jumps, then ESAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLI
1D Price
Change %
MLI100%
+0.48%
ESAB - MLI
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
CRS - MLI
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
MTUS - MLI
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
ATI - MLI
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
ZEUS - MLI
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
More