AICOF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.28M
UBSFY
Price
$2.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AICOF vs UBSFY

Header iconAICOF vs UBSFY Comparison
Open Charts AICOF vs UBSFYBanner chart's image
Generative AI Solutions
Price$0.20
Change-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Volume$9.52K
Capitalization7.28M
UbiSoft Entertainment
Price$2.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$61.58K
Capitalization1.36B
AICOF vs UBSFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AICOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AICOF vs. UBSFY commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AICOF is a Hold and UBSFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AICOF: $0.20 vs. UBSFY: $2.01)
Brand notoriety: AICOF and UBSFY are both not notable
AICOF represents the Packaged Software, while UBSFY is part of the Electronics/Appliances industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AICOF: 54% vs. UBSFY: 52%
Market capitalization -- AICOF: $7.28M vs. UBSFY: $1.36B
AICOF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.28M. UBSFY’s [@Electronics/Appliances] market capitalization is $1.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $309.84B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.97B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $12.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AICOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSFY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AICOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UBSFY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AICOF is a better buy in the long-term than UBSFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AICOF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBSFY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AICOF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UBSFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AICOF is a better buy in the short-term than UBSFY.

Price Growth

AICOF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +30.32% price change this week, while UBSFY (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -5.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Electronics/Appliances (-2.44% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBSFY($1.36B) has a higher market cap than AICOF($7.28M). UBSFY has higher P/E ratio than AICOF: UBSFY (8.01) vs AICOF (0.18). AICOF YTD gains are higher at: 152.500 vs. UBSFY (-25.519). UBSFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 888M vs. AICOF (-14.95M). UBSFY has more cash in the bank: 933M vs. AICOF (852K). AICOF has less debt than UBSFY: AICOF (1.02M) vs UBSFY (2.34B). UBSFY has higher revenues than AICOF: UBSFY (2.14B) vs AICOF (825K).
AICOFUBSFYAICOF / UBSFY
Capitalization7.28M1.36B1%
EBITDA-14.95M888M-2%
Gain YTD152.500-25.519-598%
P/E Ratio0.188.012%
Revenue825K2.14B0%
Total Cash852K933M0%
Total Debt1.02M2.34B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UBSFY: Fundamental Ratings
UBSFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AICOFUBSFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AICOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GQESX34.68N/A
N/A
GMO Quality R6
KNGLX11.82-0.01
-0.08%
Vest S&P500 Div Aristocrats Trgt Inc Inv
MBCNX17.40-0.05
-0.29%
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth R3
PCLVX22.79-0.07
-0.31%
PACE Large Co Value Equity P
BTEFX47.03-0.26
-0.55%
Boston Trust Equity

AICOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AICOF and SNAL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AICOF and SNAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AICOF
1D Price
Change %
AICOF100%
-3.81%
SNAL - AICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.74%
AIMLF - AICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+14.97%
UBSFY - AICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
WEX - AICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
WTCHF - AICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UBSFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBSFY has been loosely correlated with UBSFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBSFY jumps, then UBSFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBSFY
1D Price
Change %
UBSFY100%
+0.22%
UBSFF - UBSFY
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PLUS - UBSFY
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
MTHRY - UBSFY
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
AMPL - UBSFY
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.96%
REKR - UBSFY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
More