AICOF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
29.53M
UBSFY
Price
$2.17
Change
-$0.11 (-4.82%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
4.21B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AICOF vs UBSFY

Header iconAICOF vs UBSFY Comparison
Open Charts AICOF vs UBSFYBanner chart's image
Generative AI Solutions
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$10.3K
Capitalization29.53M
UbiSoft Entertainment
Price$2.17
Change-$0.11 (-4.82%)
Volume$114.32K
Capitalization4.21B
AICOF vs UBSFY Comparison Chart
Loading...
UBSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AICOF vs. UBSFY commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AICOF is a Hold and UBSFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (AICOF: $0.11 vs. UBSFY: $2.17)
Brand notoriety: AICOF and UBSFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AICOF: 85% vs. UBSFY: 22%
Market capitalization -- AICOF: $29.53M vs. UBSFY: $4.21B
AICOF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $29.53M. UBSFY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AICOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSFY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AICOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UBSFY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AICOF is a better buy in the long-term than UBSFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UBSFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UBSFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AICOF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +20.79% price change this week, while UBSFY (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

UBSFY is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBSFY($4.21B) has a higher market cap than AICOF($29.5M). UBSFY has higher P/E ratio than AICOF: UBSFY (39.37) vs AICOF (0.06). AICOF YTD gains are higher at: 34.375 vs. UBSFY (-19.630). UBSFY has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. AICOF (2.19M). AICOF has less debt than UBSFY: AICOF (227K) vs UBSFY (2.2B).
AICOFUBSFYAICOF / UBSFY
Capitalization29.5M4.21B1%
EBITDAN/A899M-
Gain YTD34.375-19.630-175%
P/E Ratio0.0639.370%
RevenueN/A2.11B-
Total Cash2.19M1.53B0%
Total Debt227K2.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UBSFY: Fundamental Ratings
UBSFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UBSFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UBSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOGY0.02N/A
+3.13%
Golden Grail Technology Corp
MGYOY4.36N/A
-0.06%
MOL Magyar Olaj-Es Gazipari RT
IPXHY13.11-0.05
-0.38%
Inpex Corp.
NRDBY14.45-0.19
-1.30%
Nordea Bank Abp
LTMCF0.38-0.03
-7.24%
Lithium Chile Inc.

AICOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AICOF and SNAL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AICOF and SNAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AICOF
1D Price
Change %
AICOF100%
+7.50%
SNAL - AICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
AIMLF - AICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.48%
UBSFY - AICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.82%
WEX - AICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTCHF - AICOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.12%
More

UBSFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBSFY has been loosely correlated with UBSFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBSFY jumps, then UBSFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBSFY
1D Price
Change %
UBSFY100%
-4.82%
UBSFF - UBSFY
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
PLUS - UBSFY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
MTHRY - UBSFY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
AMPL - UBSFY
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.75%
REKR - UBSFY
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
More