AIFF
Price
$2.67
Change
-$0.03 (-1.11%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
35.83M
MRT
Price
$2.39
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
188.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIFF vs MRT

Header iconAIFF vs MRT Comparison
Open Charts AIFF vs MRTBanner chart's image
Firefly Neuroscience
Price$2.67
Change-$0.03 (-1.11%)
Volume$292.6K
Capitalization35.83M
Marti Technologies
Price$2.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$36.18K
Capitalization188.11M
AIFF vs MRT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIFF vs. MRT commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFF is a Buy and MRT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AIFF: $2.67 vs. MRT: $2.39)
Brand notoriety: AIFF and MRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIFF: 11% vs. MRT: 44%
Market capitalization -- AIFF: $35.83M vs. MRT: $188.11M
AIFF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $35.83M. MRT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $188.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $310.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AIFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AIFF and MRT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIFF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIFF is a better buy in the short-term than MRT.

Price Growth

AIFF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.71% price change this week, while MRT (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.23% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRT($188M) has a higher market cap than AIFF($35.8M). AIFF YTD gains are higher at: 0.943 vs. MRT (-29.499).
AIFFMRTAIFF / MRT
Capitalization35.8M188M19%
EBITDA-22.51MN/A-
Gain YTD0.943-29.499-3%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue428KN/A-
Total Cash5.92MN/A-
Total Debt340KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIFF vs MRT: Fundamental Ratings
AIFF
MRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3584
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6463
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRT's Valuation (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIFF (49) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIFF’s over the last 12 months.

AIFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that AIFF’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.

AIFF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that AIFF’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.

MRT's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AIFF (64) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to AIFF’s over the last 12 months.

MRT's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AIFF (100) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to AIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIFFMRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMAKY5.550.11
+2.04%
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
KSBI56.00N/A
N/A
K S Bancorp, Inc.
XYIGF1.08N/A
N/A
Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd.
IPHLF4.42N/A
N/A
IPH LTD.
KNBIF0.03N/A
-8.56%
Kane Biotech Inc.

AIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIFF has been loosely correlated with SOPA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AIFF jumps, then SOPA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIFF
1D Price
Change %
AIFF100%
-0.93%
SOPA - AIFF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
CXAI - AIFF
29%
Poorly correlated
-5.32%
ELWS - AIFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
EGHT - AIFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
MRT - AIFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRT and APPS have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRT and APPS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRT
1D Price
Change %
MRT100%
N/A
APPS - MRT
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
CSGS - MRT
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
HCAT - MRT
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.00%
UBER - MRT
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
SAP - MRT
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
More