AIFLY
Price
$1.15
Change
+$0.20 (+21.05%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
62 days until earnings call
FOA
Price
$22.02
Change
+$1.09 (+5.21%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
68.72M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIFLY vs FOA

Header iconAIFLY vs FOA Comparison
Open Charts AIFLY vs FOABanner chart's image
Aiful
Price$1.15
Change+$0.20 (+21.05%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.23B
Finance of America Companies
Price$22.02
Change+$1.09 (+5.21%)
Volume$56.14K
Capitalization68.72M
AIFLY vs FOA Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIFLY vs. FOA commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFLY is a Hold and FOA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AIFLY: $1.15 vs. FOA: $22.02)
Brand notoriety: AIFLY and FOA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIFLY: 12% vs. FOA: 69%
Market capitalization -- AIFLY: $1.23B vs. FOA: $68.72M
AIFLY [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.23B. FOA’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $68.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIFLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AIFLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FOA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AIFLY and FOA are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FOA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

AIFLY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FOA (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIFLY is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2025.

FOA is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.32% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIFLY($1.23B) has a higher market cap than FOA($68.7M). AIFLY YTD gains are higher at: 21.053 vs. FOA (-21.693). FOA has less debt than AIFLY: FOA (26.3B) vs AIFLY (547B). AIFLY has higher revenues than FOA: AIFLY (141B) vs FOA (177M).
AIFLYFOAAIFLY / FOA
Capitalization1.23B68.7M1,786%
EBITDA15BN/A-
Gain YTD21.053-21.693-97%
P/E Ratio6.64N/A-
Revenue141B177M79,661%
Total Cash61.7BN/A-
Total Debt547B26.3B2,080%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIFLY vs FOA: Fundamental Ratings
AIFLY
FOA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3974
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
4910
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4237
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
832
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AIFLY's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FOA (67). This means that AIFLY’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as AIFLY (100). This means that FOA’s stock grew similarly to AIFLY’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIFLY (49). This means that FOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIFLY’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as AIFLY (42). This means that FOA’s stock grew similarly to AIFLY’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIFLY (83). This means that FOA’s stock grew significantly faster than AIFLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFR129.222.85
+2.26%
Cullen/Frost Bankers
MED12.700.23
+1.84%
Medifast
CLBK14.130.15
+1.07%
Columbia Financial
CRVO7.620.08
+1.06%
CervoMed
RY127.530.57
+0.45%
Royal Bank of Canada

AIFLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFLY and UWMC have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFLY and UWMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIFLY
1D Price
Change %
AIFLY100%
N/A
UWMC - AIFLY
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
ALTG - AIFLY
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
FOA - AIFLY
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.21%
VEL - AIFLY
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
RKT - AIFLY
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
More

FOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOA and ATLC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOA and ATLC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOA
1D Price
Change %
FOA100%
+5.21%
ATLC - FOA
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
V - FOA
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
SOFI - FOA
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
UPBD - FOA
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
R - FOA
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
More