FOA
Price
$20.05
Change
-$0.23 (-1.13%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
184.82M
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RM
Price
$34.11
Change
+$0.78 (+2.34%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
314.69M
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOA vs RM

FOA vs RM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOA vs. RM commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOA is a Hold and RM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (FOA: $20.05 vs. RM: $34.11)
Brand notoriety: FOA and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOA: 123% vs. RM: 160%
Market capitalization -- FOA: $184.82M vs. RM: $314.69M
FOA [@Savings Banks] is valued at $184.82M. RM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $314.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $698.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $35.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FOA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the long-term than FOA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the short-term than FOA.

Price Growth

FOA (@Savings Banks) experienced а -7.86% price change this week, while RM (@Savings Banks) price change was +2.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOA is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

RM is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-1.71% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RM($315M) has a higher market cap than FOA($185M). FOA has higher P/E ratio than RM: FOA (10.51) vs RM (7.18). RM YTD gains are higher at: -9.625 vs. FOA (-17.183). RM has less debt than FOA: RM (1.66B) vs FOA (30.8B). RM has higher revenues than FOA: RM (580M) vs FOA (360M).
FOARMFOA / RM
Capitalization185M315M59%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.183-9.625179%
P/E Ratio10.517.18146%
Revenue360M580M62%
Total CashN/A4.86M-
Total Debt30.8B1.66B1,854%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOA vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
FOA
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6430
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5636
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6363
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
985
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOA (58) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOA’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FOA (100) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (36) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FOA (56) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FOA (63) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RM (85) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew significantly faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOARM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEDYX39.910.43
+1.09%
Invesco International Value Y
BIGFX35.910.32
+0.90%
Baron International Growth Retail
GLNKX24.890.17
+0.69%
MFS Global New Discovery R2
TWQIX20.220.11
+0.55%
Transamerica Large Cap Value I
OGEAX114.900.50
+0.44%
JPMorgan Equity Index A

FOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOA has been loosely correlated with RM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOA jumps, then RM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOA
1D Price
Change %
FOA100%
-1.13%
RM - FOA
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
OMF - FOA
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
AFRM - FOA
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.64%
ALLY - FOA
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
CACC - FOA
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
More

RM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RM has been loosely correlated with MFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RM jumps, then MFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RM
1D Price
Change %
RM100%
+2.34%
MFIN - RM
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
CTOS - RM
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
UPBD - RM
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
OPRT - RM
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
OCSL - RM
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
More