FOA
Price
$10.91Alerts
Change
-$0.46 (-4.05%)
Updated
Nov 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
117.44M
123 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RM
Price
$34.74Alerts
Change
-$0.55 (-1.56%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
334.44M
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOA vs RM

FOA vs RM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOA vs. RM commentary
Nov 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOA is a Buy and RM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for FOA with price predictions
Nov 12, 2026

FOA's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FOA turned positive on October 20, 2026. Looking at past instances where FOA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 37 of 41 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FOA's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 32 of 38 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FOA as a result. In 80 of 94 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.

Following a +21.84% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FOA advanced for three days, in 203 of 261 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 52 of 59 cases where FOA's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FOA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.

FOA broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for FOA entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 22 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.339) is normal, around the industry mean (3.902). P/E Ratio (22.351) is within average values for comparable stocks, (6.401). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (3.918). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.189) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.401) is also within normal values, averaging (5.901).

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. FOA’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FOA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock worse than average.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for RM with price predictions
Nov 12, 2026

RM's RSI Indicator recovers from overbought zone

The 10-day RSI Oscillator for RM moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 28 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In 26 of the 28 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 12, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on RM as a result. In 73 of 95 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for RM turned negative on November 10, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 32 of the 45 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 71%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.

RM broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.

RM moved above its 50-day moving average on October 27, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

The 10-day moving average for RM crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 12 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.

Following a +8.14% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RM advanced for three days, in 222 of 313 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 138 of 209 cases where RM Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 66%.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 16 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 19 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.884) is normal, around the industry mean (3.902). P/E Ratio (7.150) is within average values for comparable stocks, (6.401). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.050) is also within normal values, averaging (3.918). Dividend Yield (0.033) settles around the average of (0.189) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.545) is also within normal values, averaging (5.901).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. RM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. RM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock worse than average.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOA vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
FOA
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1475
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4216
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
275
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FOA (22) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FOA (100) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FOA (42) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to FOA’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOA (82) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOA’s over the last 12 months.

FOA's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RM (75) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FOA’s stock grew significantly faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOARM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 13, 2026
Stock price -- (FOA: $10.94 vs. RM: $34.74)
Brand notoriety: FOA and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOA: 95% vs. RM: 82%
Market capitalization -- FOA: $117.44M vs. RM: $334.44M
FOA [@Savings Banks] is valued at $117.44M. RM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $334.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $831.64K to $793.46B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $36.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while RM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FOA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FOA and RM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FOA and RM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FOA (@Savings Banks) experienced а -14.73% price change this week, while RM (@Savings Banks) price change was -7.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -5.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOA is expected to report earnings on Mar 16, 2027.

RM is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-5.14% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOA has been loosely correlated with UPST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOA jumps, then UPST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOA
1D Price
Change %
FOA100%
-3.78%
UPST - FOA
41%
Loosely correlated
-6.86%
RM - FOA
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
AFRM - FOA
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
ALLY - FOA
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
OMF - FOA
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
More

RM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RM has been loosely correlated with MFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RM jumps, then MFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RM
1D Price
Change %
RM100%
-1.56%
MFIN - RM
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
CTOS - RM
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
UPBD - RM
48%
Loosely correlated
-5.50%
OCSL - RM
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
OBDC - RM
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAYZ36.310.74
+2.07%
TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF (MAYZ)
DDLS44.72-0.04
-0.10%
WisdomTree Dynamic International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS)
STXT19.07-0.10
-0.50%
Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT)
ULE11.55-0.09
-0.76%
ProShares Ultra Euro (ULE)
FAS177.66-3.83
-2.11%
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS)