Ad is loading...
AIFU
Price
$1.53
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
SLQT
Price
$2.83
Change
-$0.15 (-5.03%)
Updated
Nov 26, 04:00 PM (EDT)
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AIFU vs SLQT

Header iconAIFU vs SLQT Comparison
Open Charts AIFU vs SLQTBanner chart's image
AIX
Price$1.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$127.5K
CapitalizationN/A
SelectQuote
Price$2.83
Change-$0.15 (-5.03%)
Volume$90.07K
CapitalizationN/A
AIFU vs SLQT Comparison Chart
Loading...
AIFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLQT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIFU vs. SLQT commentary
Nov 27, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFU is a Hold and SLQT is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 27, 2024
Stock price -- (AIFU: $1.38 vs. SLQT: $2.98)
Brand notoriety: AIFU and SLQT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Insurance Brokers/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIFU: 52% vs. SLQT: 67%
Market capitalization -- AIFU: $269.5M vs. SLQT: $337.99M
AIFU [@Insurance Brokers/Services] is valued at $269.5M. SLQT’s [@Insurance Brokers/Services] market capitalization is $337.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry ranges from $100.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry is $21.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIFU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLQT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIFU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLQT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AIFU and SLQT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIFU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLQT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIFU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLQT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIFU is a better buy in the short-term than SLQT.

Price Growth

AIFU (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а +22.12% price change this week, while SLQT (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was +20.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was +4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIFU is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2024.

SLQT is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Insurance Brokers/Services (+4.19% weekly)

Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLQT($338M) has a higher market cap than AIFU($270M). SLQT has higher P/E ratio than AIFU: SLQT (6.88) vs AIFU (4.96). SLQT YTD gains are higher at: 117.518 vs. AIFU (-79.248). AIFU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 424M vs. SLQT (56.5M). AIFU has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. SLQT (10.8M). AIFU has less debt than SLQT: AIFU (304M) vs SLQT (724M). AIFU has higher revenues than SLQT: AIFU (3.36B) vs SLQT (1.16B).
AIFUSLQTAIFU / SLQT
Capitalization270M338M80%
EBITDA424M56.5M750%
Gain YTD-79.248117.518-67%
P/E Ratio4.966.8872%
Revenue3.36B1.16B290%
Total Cash1.5B10.8M13,870%
Total Debt304M724M42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIFU: Fundamental Ratings
AIFU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
72
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIFUSLQT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AIFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLQT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASVDX12.240.23
+1.92%
American Century Small Cap Value R6
HSCCX3.480.02
+0.58%
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth C
FEMYX11.400.02
+0.18%
Fidelity Series Sustainable Emerg Mkts
WFPDX13.97N/A
N/A
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr Adm
GSBAX15.75N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth C

AIFU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFU and BRO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFU and BRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIFU
1D Price
Change %
AIFU100%
+9.52%
BRO - AIFU
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
SLQT - AIFU
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.20%
HUIZ - AIFU
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
EHTH - AIFU
19%
Poorly correlated
+9.00%
AJG - AIFU
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
More

SLQT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLQT and EHTH have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLQT and EHTH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLQT
1D Price
Change %
SLQT100%
+4.20%
EHTH - SLQT
32%
Poorly correlated
+9.00%
CRVL - SLQT
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
BRO - SLQT
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
MMC - SLQT
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
GOCO - SLQT
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
More