AIFU
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Updated
Apr 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
269.5M
55 days until earnings call
SLQT
Price
$3.52
Change
+$0.10 (+2.92%)
Updated
Apr 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
337.99M
36 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AIFU vs SLQT

Header iconAIFU vs SLQT Comparison
Open Charts AIFU vs SLQTBanner chart's image
AIX
Price$0.21
Change-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Volume$10.9K
Capitalization269.5M
SelectQuote
Price$3.52
Change+$0.10 (+2.92%)
Volume$12.65K
Capitalization337.99M
AIFU vs SLQT Comparison Chart
Loading...
AIFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLQT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIFU vs. SLQT commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFU is a Hold and SLQT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (AIFU: $0.22 vs. SLQT: $3.42)
Brand notoriety: AIFU and SLQT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Insurance Brokers/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIFU: 14% vs. SLQT: 47%
Market capitalization -- AIFU: $269.5M vs. SLQT: $337.99M
AIFU [@Insurance Brokers/Services] is valued at $269.5M. SLQT’s [@Insurance Brokers/Services] market capitalization is $337.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry ranges from $100.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry is $21.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIFU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLQT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIFU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLQT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIFU is a better buy in the long-term than SLQT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIFU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLQT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIFU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLQT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIFU is a better buy in the short-term than SLQT.

Price Growth

AIFU (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -30.18% price change this week, while SLQT (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was -9.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIFU is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2025.

SLQT is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Insurance Brokers/Services (-2.81% weekly)

Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLQT($338M) has a higher market cap than AIFU($270M). SLQT has higher P/E ratio than AIFU: SLQT (6.88) vs AIFU (4.96). SLQT YTD gains are higher at: -8.065 vs. AIFU (-79.791). AIFU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 424M vs. SLQT (56.5M). AIFU has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. SLQT (10.8M). AIFU has less debt than SLQT: AIFU (304M) vs SLQT (724M). AIFU has higher revenues than SLQT: AIFU (3.36B) vs SLQT (1.16B).
AIFUSLQTAIFU / SLQT
Capitalization270M338M80%
EBITDA424M56.5M750%
Gain YTD-79.791-8.065989%
P/E Ratio4.966.8872%
Revenue3.36B1.16B290%
Total Cash1.5B10.8M13,870%
Total Debt304M724M42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIFU: Fundamental Ratings
AIFU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIFUSLQT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AIFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLQT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGWIX22.140.03
+0.14%
Vanguard Global Wellesley Income Inv
SLCVX25.66N/A
N/A
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
PRERX28.04N/A
N/A
Principal Real Estate Securities R3
MSCRX10.34N/A
N/A
Madison Small Cap R6
CUURX49.59N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Value I Inst2

AIFU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFU and SLQT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFU and SLQT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIFU
1D Price
Change %
AIFU100%
+5.81%
SLQT - AIFU
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
HUIZ - AIFU
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
EHTH - AIFU
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
WTW - AIFU
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
ERIE - AIFU
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
More

SLQT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLQT has been loosely correlated with EHTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLQT jumps, then EHTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLQT
1D Price
Change %
SLQT100%
+2.40%
EHTH - SLQT
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
CRVL - SLQT
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
BRO - SLQT
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
MMC - SLQT
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
GOCO - SLQT
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
More