Advertisement
AIFU vs SLQT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFU is a Hold and SLQT is a Hold.
| AIFU | SLQT | AIFU / SLQT | |
| Capitalization | 66.4M | 88.3M | 75% |
| EBITDA | -2.26B | 138M | -1,641% |
| Gain YTD | -79.963 | -64.539 | 124% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.12 | 145.00 | 0% |
| Revenue | 557M | 1.62B | 34% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 16M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 396M | - |
AIFU | SLQT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AIFU's Valuation (14) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLQT (87) in the null industry. This means that AIFU’s stock grew significantly faster than SLQT’s over the last 12 months.
AIFU's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SLQT (100) in the null industry. This means that AIFU’s stock grew similarly to SLQT’s over the last 12 months.
SLQT's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as AIFU (99) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SLQT’s stock grew similarly to AIFU’s over the last 12 months.
SLQT's Price Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as AIFU (97) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SLQT’s stock grew similarly to AIFU’s over the last 12 months.
SLQT's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as AIFU (97) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SLQT’s stock grew similarly to AIFU’s over the last 12 months.
| AIFU | SLQT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 77% | 24 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIFU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SLQT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AIFU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SLQT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AIFU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLQT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AIFU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SLQT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AIFU (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -42.13% price change this week, while SLQT (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was -6.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -6.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.34%.
Reported Earning Dates
SLQT is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Insurance Brokers/Services (-6.85% weekly)Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.
Advertisement
AIFU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFU and EHTH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFU and EHTH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AIFU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIFU | 100% | -13.67% | ||
| EHTH - AIFU | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
| ERIE - AIFU | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.93% | ||
| SLQT - AIFU | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.84% | ||
| RYAN - AIFU | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
| HUIZ - AIFU | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.77% | ||
More | ||||