AIMLF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.84M
ZETA
Price
$12.25
Change
+$0.62 (+5.33%)
Updated
Apr 9, 03:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.36B
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AIMLF vs ZETA

Header iconAIMLF vs ZETA Comparison
Open Charts AIMLF vs ZETABanner chart's image
AI / ML Innovations
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization3.84M
Zeta Global Holdings
Price$12.25
Change+$0.62 (+5.33%)
Volume$28.64K
Capitalization2.36B
AIMLF vs ZETA Comparison Chart
Loading...
ZETA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIMLF vs. ZETA commentary
Apr 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIMLF is a Hold and ZETA is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 09, 2025
Stock price -- (AIMLF: $0.04 vs. ZETA: $11.63)
Brand notoriety: AIMLF and ZETA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIMLF: 7% vs. ZETA: 73%
Market capitalization -- AIMLF: $3.84M vs. ZETA: $2.36B
AIMLF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.84M. ZETA’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZETA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZETA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AIMLF and ZETA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ZETA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ZETA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AIMLF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -14.11% price change this week, while ZETA (@Packaged Software) price change was -17.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -8.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZETA is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-8.90% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZETA($2.36B) has a higher market cap than AIMLF($3.84M). ZETA YTD gains are higher at: -35.353 vs. AIMLF (-54.436). AIMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.78M vs. ZETA (-124.36M). ZETA has more cash in the bank: 132M vs. AIMLF (127K). AIMLF has less debt than ZETA: AIMLF (231K) vs ZETA (184M). ZETA has higher revenues than AIMLF: ZETA (729M) vs AIMLF (375K).
AIMLFZETAAIMLF / ZETA
Capitalization3.84M2.36B0%
EBITDA-1.78M-124.36M1%
Gain YTD-54.436-35.353154%
P/E Ratio0.31N/A-
Revenue375K729M0%
Total Cash127K132M0%
Total Debt231K184M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIMLF: Fundamental Ratings
AIMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ZETA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ZETA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VBAIX43.90N/A
N/A
Vanguard Balanced Index I
LRSQX10.56N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
SCRLX61.54N/A
N/A
Touchstone Large Cap Focused Instl
NOANX29.05N/A
N/A
Natixis Oakmark N
LFSFX23.79N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F

AIMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIMLF and BWLKF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIMLF and BWLKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIMLF
1D Price
Change %
AIMLF100%
N/A
BWLKF - AIMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IARGF - AIMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AICOF - AIMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMEO - AIMLF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
ZETA - AIMLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
More