Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AIOOX vs FCWGX
AIOOX vs FCWGX Comparison
Open Charts AIOOX vs FCWGX
AIOOX vs FCWGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCWGX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. AIOOX (27.7M). AIOOX pays higher dividends than FCWGX: AIOOX (1.75) vs FCWGX (1.54). AIOOX was incepted earlier than FCWGX: AIOOX (14 years) vs FCWGX (6 years). AIOOX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FCWGX (0.51). FCWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. AIOOX (10.00). AIOOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCWGX: AIOOX (0) vs FCWGX (250). FCWGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.45 vs. AIOOX (1.92). FCWGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.67 vs. AIOOX (-19.62).
| AIOOX | FCWGX | AIOOX / FCWGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.51 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.51 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.387 | 13.378 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.7M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.54 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.92 | 14.45 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.38 | 45.32 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.62 | 35.67 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement