Advertisement
AIZ vs AMBC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIZ is a Hold and AMBC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIZ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileAMBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AIZ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- AMBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AIZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AMBC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AIZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- AMBC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AIZ (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +4.54% price change this week, while AMBC (@Specialty Insurance) price change was +15.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.03%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
AIZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
AMBC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.95% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
@Specialty Insurance (+0.87% weekly)Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.
| AIZ | AMBC | AIZ / AMBC | |
| Capitalization | 10.7B | 373M | 2,869% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.429 | -36.443 | -1% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.41 | 7.52 | 205% |
| Revenue | 12.1B | 249M | 4,859% |
| Total Cash | 4.12B | 315M | 1,309% |
| Total Debt | 2.08B | 150M | 1,389% |
AIZ | AMBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 44 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AIZ's Valuation (61) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as AMBC (72). This means that AIZ’s stock grew similarly to AMBC’s over the last 12 months.
AIZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Specialty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMBC (100). This means that AIZ’s stock grew significantly faster than AMBC’s over the last 12 months.
AIZ's SMR Rating (88) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as AMBC (97). This means that AIZ’s stock grew similarly to AMBC’s over the last 12 months.
AIZ's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMBC (61). This means that AIZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMBC’s over the last 12 months.
AMBC's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as AIZ (26). This means that AMBC’s stock grew similarly to AIZ’s over the last 12 months.
| AIZ | AMBC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 27% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 10 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMGF | 53.73 | 0.18 | +0.34% |
| iShares Em Mkts Eq Fac ETF | |||
| CHFUSD | 1.24 | N/A | N/A |
| Switzerland Franc - United States Dollar | |||
| AUDHKD | 5.09 | N/A | N/A |
| Australian Dollar - Hong Kong Dollar | |||
| GBPCNY | 9.71 | N/A | N/A |
| United Kingdom Pound - China Yuan | |||
| NZDCAD | 0.82 | N/A | N/A |
| New Zealand Dollar - Canadian Dollar | |||
AIZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIZ has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AIZ jumps, then L could also see price increases.
AMBC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBC has been loosely correlated with MBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBC jumps, then MBI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBC | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| MBI - AMBC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| MTG - AMBC | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| AMSF - AMBC | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| AGO - AMBC | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| AIZ - AMBC | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||