AKA
Price
$14.50
Change
+$1.23 (+9.27%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
157.24M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
LQDT
Price
$24.82
Change
+$0.26 (+1.06%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
775.3M
26 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AKA vs LQDT

Header iconAKA vs LQDT Comparison
Open Charts AKA vs LQDTBanner chart's image
aka Brands Holding
Price$14.50
Change+$1.23 (+9.27%)
Volume$33.16K
Capitalization157.24M
Liquidity Services
Price$24.82
Change+$0.26 (+1.06%)
Volume$113.49K
Capitalization775.3M
AKA vs LQDT Comparison Chart in %
AKA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AKA vs. LQDT commentary
Oct 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AKA is a StrongBuy and LQDT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 25, 2025
Stock price -- (AKA: $14.50 vs. LQDT: $24.82)
Brand notoriety: AKA and LQDT are both not notable
AKA represents the Apparel/Footwear Retail, while LQDT is part of the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AKA: 119% vs. LQDT: 62%
Market capitalization -- AKA: $157.24M vs. LQDT: $775.3M
AKA [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $157.24M. LQDT’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $775.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $179.77B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.39T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $16.78B. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $51.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AKA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLQDT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AKA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LQDT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AKA is a better buy in the long-term than LQDT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AKA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LQDT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AKA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LQDT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AKA and LQDT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AKA (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -2.68% price change this week, while LQDT (@Internet Retail) price change was +6.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +3.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.79%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +654.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

LQDT is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+3.33% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

@Internet Retail (+1.74% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LQDT($775M) has a higher market cap than AKA($157M). AKA (-22.543) and LQDT (-23.134) have similar YTD gains . LQDT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 41.9M vs. AKA (5.33M). LQDT has more cash in the bank: 167M vs. AKA (23.1M). LQDT has less debt than AKA: LQDT (14.2M) vs AKA (195M). AKA has higher revenues than LQDT: AKA (598M) vs LQDT (466M).
AKALQDTAKA / LQDT
Capitalization157M775M20%
EBITDA5.33M41.9M13%
Gain YTD-22.543-23.13497%
P/E RatioN/A29.90-
Revenue598M466M128%
Total Cash23.1M167M14%
Total Debt195M14.2M1,373%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQDT: Fundamental Ratings
LQDT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
60
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
57
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AKALQDT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AKA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BXBLY32.300.16
+0.50%
Brambles, Ltd.
BIOF0.18N/A
+0.06%
Blue Biofuels Inc.
BLBRF0.03N/A
N/A
Bloomberry Resorts Corp
CCHI0.17N/A
N/A
Cambridge Capital Holdings, Inc.
KELRF8.03N/A
N/A
Keisei Electric Rail

AKA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AKA and CVNA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AKA and CVNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AKA
1D Price
Change %
AKA100%
+9.27%
CVNA - AKA
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
BABA - AKA
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
ETSY - AKA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
VIPS - AKA
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LQDT - AKA
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
More

LQDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LQDT has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LQDT jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQDT
1D Price
Change %
LQDT100%
+1.06%
CVNA - LQDT
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
SE - LQDT
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
RVLV - LQDT
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
DIBS - LQDT
24%
Poorly correlated
+8.64%
PRTS - LQDT
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.87%
More