AL
Price
$47.32
Change
+$0.27 (+0.57%)
Updated
Jan 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.7B
21 days until earnings call
OMF
Price
$58.08
Change
+$0.98 (+1.72%)
Updated
Jan 23, 04:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.02B
8 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AL vs OMF

Header iconAL vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts AL vs OMFBanner chart's image
Air Lease
Price$47.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.57%)
Volume$5.91K
Capitalization5.7B
OneMain Holdings
Price$58.08
Change+$0.98 (+1.72%)
Volume$591
Capitalization6.02B
AL vs OMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AL vs. OMF commentary
Jan 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AL is a Buy and OMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 24, 2025
Stock price -- (AL: $47.05 vs. OMF: $57.10)
Brand notoriety: AL and OMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AL: 82% vs. OMF: 144%
Market capitalization -- AL: $5.7B vs. OMF: $6.02B
AL [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.7B. OMF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • AL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than AL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AL and OMF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +4.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

AL is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+2.33% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than AL($5.7B). AL has higher P/E ratio than OMF: AL (9.96) vs OMF (9.44). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 9.534 vs. AL (-2.406). AL (19.2B) and OMF (19.8B) have identical debt. OMF has higher revenues than AL: OMF (4.28B) vs AL (2.69B).
ALOMFAL / OMF
Capitalization5.7B6.02B95%
EBITDA1.88BN/A-
Gain YTD-2.4069.534-25%
P/E Ratio9.969.44105%
Revenue2.69B4.28B63%
Total Cash461MN/A-
Total Debt19.2B19.8B97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AL vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
AL
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1726
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8620
SMR RATING
1..100
807
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4219
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for AL (87). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than AL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for AL (86). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than AL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for AL (80). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than AL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as AL (51). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to AL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as AL (42). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to AL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JANT36.880.12
+0.33%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF
DJP33.970.05
+0.15%
iPath® Bloomberg Cmdty TR ETN
BEMB52.09-0.04
-0.08%
iShares J.P. Morgan Brd USD Emr MktBdETF
FNDC34.57-0.16
-0.46%
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
RAYS8.74-0.24
-2.67%
Global X Solar ETF

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+2.57%
ENVA - OMF
71%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
COF - OMF
70%
Closely correlated
+4.00%
SYF - OMF
67%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
SLM - OMF
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
DFS - OMF
63%
Loosely correlated
+4.35%
More