AL
Price
$45.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
20 days until earnings call
OMF
Price
$48.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AL vs OMF

Header iconAL vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts AL vs OMFBanner chart's image
Air Lease
Price$45.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$879.24K
CapitalizationN/A
OneMain Holdings
Price$48.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.03M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AL vs OMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
AL vs. OMF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AL is a StrongBuy and OMF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AL: $45.00 vs. OMF: $48.03)
Brand notoriety: AL and OMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AL: 63% vs. OMF: 99%
Market capitalization -- AL: $5.7B vs. OMF: $6.02B
AL [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.7B. OMF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than AL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AL and OMF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +5.16% price change this week, while OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +4.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

AL is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.05% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than AL($5.7B). AL has higher P/E ratio than OMF: AL (9.96) vs OMF (9.44). AL YTD gains are higher at: 8.782 vs. OMF (4.103). AL (19.2B) and OMF (19.8B) have identical debt. OMF has higher revenues than AL: OMF (4.28B) vs AL (2.69B).
ALOMFAL / OMF
Capitalization5.7B6.02B95%
EBITDA1.88BN/A-
Gain YTD8.7824.103214%
P/E Ratio9.969.44105%
Revenue2.69B4.28B63%
Total Cash461MN/A-
Total Debt19.2B19.8B97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AL vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
AL
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
586
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7626
SMR RATING
1..100
787
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5736
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for AL (89). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than AL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AL (76). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for AL (78). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than AL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as AL (59). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to AL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as AL (57). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to AL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with COF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then COF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+2.89%
COF - OMF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
SYF - OMF
67%
Closely correlated
+6.06%
SLM - OMF
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
ENVA - OMF
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.02%
DFS - OMF
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More