AL
Price
$47.03
Change
-$2.05 (-4.18%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
57 days until earnings call
OMF
Price
$52.24
Change
-$1.54 (-2.86%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:26 PM (EDT)
49 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AL vs OMF

Header iconAL vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts AL vs OMFBanner chart's image
Air Lease
Price$47.03
Change-$2.05 (-4.18%)
Volume$9.22K
CapitalizationN/A
OneMain Holdings
Price$52.24
Change-$1.54 (-2.86%)
Volume$1.65K
CapitalizationN/A
AL vs OMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AL vs. OMF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AL is a Hold and OMF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AL: $49.08 vs. OMF: $53.78)
Brand notoriety: AL and OMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AL: 150% vs. OMF: 79%
Market capitalization -- AL: $5.7B vs. OMF: $6.02B
AL [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.7B. OMF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • AL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than AL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the short-term than AL.

Price Growth

AL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -1.62% price change this week, while OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -5.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

AL is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-5.00% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than AL($5.7B). AL has higher P/E ratio than OMF: AL (9.96) vs OMF (9.44). AL (19.168) and OMF (18.779) have similar YTD gains . AL (19.2B) and OMF (19.8B) have identical debt. OMF has higher revenues than AL: OMF (4.28B) vs AL (2.69B).
ALOMFAL / OMF
Capitalization5.7B6.02B95%
EBITDA1.88BN/A-
Gain YTD19.16818.779102%
P/E Ratio9.969.44105%
Revenue2.69B4.28B63%
Total Cash461MN/A-
Total Debt19.2B19.8B97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AL vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
AL
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5814
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7522
SMR RATING
1..100
797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3924
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for AL (88). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than AL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AL (75). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for AL (79). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than AL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as AL (46). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to AL’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as AL (39). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to AL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEDM49.56-0.06
-0.13%
FlexShares ESG&Clmt Dev Mkts ex-US Cr
BUFF45.23-0.07
-0.17%
Innovator Laddered Allc Pwr Bfr ETF™
VSGX58.36-0.23
-0.39%
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
INDS36.79-0.15
-0.41%
Pacer Benchmark Industrial RE SCTR ETF
EMDV43.99-0.59
-1.33%
ProShares MSCI Emerg Mkts Div Growers

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
-3.50%
ENVA - OMF
69%
Closely correlated
-2.49%
COF - OMF
69%
Closely correlated
-2.12%
SYF - OMF
67%
Closely correlated
-1.98%
SLM - OMF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
DFS - OMF
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
More