BFH
Price
$103.55
Change
-$0.14 (-0.14%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.19B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OMF
Price
$58.07
Change
-$0.16 (-0.27%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.73B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFH vs OMF

BFH vs OMF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFH vs. OMF commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFH is a Buy and OMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BFH: $103.68 vs. OMF: $58.23)
Brand notoriety: BFH: Notable vs. OMF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFH: 82% vs. OMF: 99%
Market capitalization -- BFH: $4.19B vs. OMF: $6.73B
BFH [@Savings Banks] is valued at $4.19B. OMF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $6.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $621.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $30.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BFH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than BFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the short-term than BFH.

Price Growth

BFH (@Savings Banks) experienced а +1.15% price change this week, while OMF (@Savings Banks) price change was +0.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFH is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.05% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.73B) has a higher market cap than BFH($4.19B). OMF (8.68) and BFH (8.46) have similar P/E ratio . BFH YTD gains are higher at: 40.825 vs. OMF (-10.501). BFH has less debt than OMF: BFH (3.94B) vs OMF (22.4B). OMF has higher revenues than BFH: OMF (5.05B) vs BFH (3.89B).
BFHOMFBFH / OMF
Capitalization4.19B6.73B62%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD40.825-10.501-389%
P/E Ratio8.468.6898%
Revenue3.89B5.05B77%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.94B22.4B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFH vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
BFH
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4320
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8243
SMR RATING
1..100
1110
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6375
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFH (64) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFH’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFH (82) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFH’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as BFH (11) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to BFH’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as OMF (48) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as OMF (75) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFHOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCQ8.860.01
+0.11%
Pimco California Municipal Income Fund
ESGG232.43N/A
N/A
FlexShares STOXX Glbl ESG Select ETF
COPX84.89-0.59
-0.69%
Global X Copper Miners ETF
XRPI6.26-0.06
-0.95%
XRP ETF
EKG17.35-0.33
-1.87%
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Dgtl Hlth SoluETF

BFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFH has been closely correlated with COF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFH jumps, then COF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFH
1D Price
Change %
BFH100%
+1.24%
COF - BFH
79%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
SYF - BFH
76%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
AXP - BFH
71%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
OMF - BFH
70%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
ALLY - BFH
68%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+0.09%
SYF - OMF
78%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
ALLY - OMF
75%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
R - OMF
72%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
COF - OMF
71%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
URI - OMF
70%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
More