Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALAFX vs RGEBX
ALAFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts ALAFX vs RGEBX
ALAFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALAFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALAFX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. ALAFX (7.76B). ALAFX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ALAFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: ALAFX (14 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than ALAFX (0.99). ALAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 134.46 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALAFX: RGEBX (250) vs ALAFX (1000). ALAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.89 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). ALAFX return over 5 years is better than : 83.40 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| ALAFX | RGEBX | ALAFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.08 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.08 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.110 | 8.727 | 162% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.76B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.89 | -0.77 | -1,149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 145.60 | 39.77 | 366% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.40 | 9.71 | 859% |
| Returns for 10 years | 390.22 | 97.58 | 400% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement