Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALARX vs RGEBX
ALARX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts ALARX vs RGEBX
ALARX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALARX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALARX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. ALARX (3.47B). ALARX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: ALARX (0.06) vs RGEBX (0.00). ALARX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: ALARX (33 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). ALARX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). ALARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.42 vs. RGEBX (32.00). ALARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: ALARX (0) vs RGEBX (250). ALARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.38 vs. RGEBX (7.59). ALARX return over 5 years is better than : 32.11 vs. RGEBX (14.58).
| ALARX | RGEBX | ALARX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.08 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.08 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.961 | 6.379 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.47B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.38 | 7.59 | 335% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.12 | 41.56 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.11 | 14.58 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.32 | 100.04 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement