ALB
Price
$81.20
Change
-$1.31 (-1.59%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
15.48B
66 days until earnings call
BNTGF
Price
$61.18
Change
+$3.95 (+6.90%)
Updated
Jan 31 closing price
Capitalization
11.97B
Ad is loading...

ALB vs BNTGF

Header iconALB vs BNTGF Comparison
Open Charts ALB vs BNTGFBanner chart's image
Albemarle
Price$81.20
Change-$1.31 (-1.59%)
Volume$1.68M
Capitalization15.48B
Brenntag SE
Price$61.18
Change+$3.95 (+6.90%)
Volume$148
Capitalization11.97B
ALB vs BNTGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ALB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALB vs. BNTGF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALB is a Hold and BNTGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (ALB: $81.20 vs. BNTGF: $61.18)
Brand notoriety: ALB and BNTGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALB: 72% vs. BNTGF: 33%
Market capitalization -- ALB: $15.48B vs. BNTGF: $11.97B
ALB [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $15.48B. BNTGF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $11.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBNTGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BNTGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALB is a better buy in the long-term than BNTGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ALB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -0.01% price change this week, while BNTGF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALB is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.74% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALB($15.5B) has a higher market cap than BNTGF($12B). BNTGF has higher P/E ratio than ALB: BNTGF (12.35) vs ALB (9.67). BNTGF YTD gains are higher at: 2.986 vs. ALB (-5.669). BNTGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.71B vs. ALB (793M). ALB (890M) and BNTGF (871M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . BNTGF has less debt than ALB: BNTGF (462M) vs ALB (4.28B). BNTGF has higher revenues than ALB: BNTGF (19.4B) vs ALB (9.62B).
ALBBNTGFALB / BNTGF
Capitalization15.5B12B129%
EBITDA793M1.71B46%
Gain YTD-5.6692.986-190%
P/E Ratio9.6712.3578%
Revenue9.62B19.4B50%
Total Cash890M871M102%
Total Debt4.28B462M926%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALB vs BNTGF: Fundamental Ratings
ALB
BNTGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9576
SMR RATING
1..100
9460
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
257
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNTGF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as ALB (95) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BNTGF’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.

BNTGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as ALB (95) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BNTGF’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.

BNTGF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALB (94) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BNTGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALB’s over the last 12 months.

BNTGF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as ALB (64) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BNTGF’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.

ALB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNTGF (57) in the null industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNTGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ALB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAPBX20.84N/A
N/A
NYLI WMC Value Class B
COSYX11.29-0.09
-0.79%
Columbia Overseas Value Inst3
RGCIX9.20-0.09
-0.97%
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure C
BSPAX704.07-12.20
-1.70%
iShares S&P 500 Index Investor A
ALSRX16.15-0.61
-3.64%
Alger Small Cap Growth Institutional I

BNTGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNTGF and RPM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNTGF and RPM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNTGF
1D Price
Change %
BNTGF100%
N/A
RPM - BNTGF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
SCL - BNTGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
SQM - BNTGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
AHKSY - BNTGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
ALB - BNTGF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
More