ALB
Price
$80.22
Change
-$0.72 (-0.89%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.53B
42 days until earnings call
EMN
Price
$66.02
Change
+$0.03 (+0.05%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.58B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALB vs EMN

Header iconALB vs EMN Comparison
Open Charts ALB vs EMNBanner chart's image
Albemarle
Price$80.22
Change-$0.72 (-0.89%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization9.53B
Eastman Chemical
Price$66.02
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
Volume$5.57K
Capitalization7.58B
ALB vs EMN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALB vs. EMN commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALB is a StrongBuy and EMN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ALB: $80.16 vs. EMN: $65.99)
Brand notoriety: ALB and EMN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALB: 56% vs. EMN: 67%
Market capitalization -- ALB: $9.53B vs. EMN: $7.48B
ALB [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $9.53B. EMN’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $7.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $221.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALB is a better buy in the long-term than EMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALB’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EMN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALB is a better buy in the short-term than EMN.

Price Growth

ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +9.92% price change this week, while EMN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -1.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

EMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.31% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALB($9.53B) has a higher market cap than EMN($7.58B). ALB has higher P/E ratio than EMN: ALB (33.94) vs EMN (9.28). ALB YTD gains are higher at: -5.231 vs. EMN (-25.372). EMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.73B vs. ALB (-281.58M). ALB has less debt than EMN: ALB (3.72B) vs EMN (5.13B). EMN has higher revenues than ALB: EMN (9.29B) vs ALB (4.99B).
ALBEMNALB / EMN
Capitalization9.53B7.58B126%
EBITDA-281.58M1.73B-16%
Gain YTD-5.231-25.37221%
P/E Ratio33.949.28366%
Revenue4.99B9.29B54%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.72B5.13B73%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALB vs EMN: Fundamental Ratings
ALB
EMN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1059
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
9555
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4964
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
386
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMN's Valuation (39) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALB (86) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALB’s over the last 12 months.

EMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as ALB (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.

EMN's SMR Rating (55) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALB (95) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALB’s over the last 12 months.

ALB's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as EMN (64) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

ALB's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for EMN (86) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew significantly faster than EMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALBEMN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIRIX10.57N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Intl Real Estate I
FPCGX28.24N/A
N/A
Fort Pitt Capital Total Return
ALGRX109.59N/A
N/A
Alger Focus Equity I
PEQZX26.35N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Blend Z
RGAFX88.07-0.43
-0.49%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5

EMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMN has been closely correlated with HUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMN jumps, then HUN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMN
1D Price
Change %
EMN100%
N/A
HUN - EMN
73%
Closely correlated
-5.41%
LYB - EMN
72%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
DD - EMN
69%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
DOW - EMN
69%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
ASIX - EMN
66%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
More