ALB
Price
$105.64
Change
+$8.28 (+8.50%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
12.43B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
EMN
Price
$62.70
Change
-$0.38 (-0.60%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.2B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALB vs EMN

Header iconALB vs EMN Comparison
Open Charts ALB vs EMNBanner chart's image
Albemarle
Price$105.64
Change+$8.28 (+8.50%)
Volume$5.11M
Capitalization12.43B
Eastman Chemical
Price$62.70
Change-$0.38 (-0.60%)
Volume$1.26M
Capitalization7.2B
ALB vs EMN Comparison Chart in %
ALB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALB vs. EMN commentary
Oct 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALB is a StrongBuy and EMN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 25, 2025
Stock price -- (ALB: $105.64 vs. EMN: $62.70)
Brand notoriety: ALB and EMN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALB: 144% vs. EMN: 87%
Market capitalization -- ALB: $12.43B vs. EMN: $7.2B
ALB [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $12.43B. EMN’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $7.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $209.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEMN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALB is a better buy in the long-term than EMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMN is a better buy in the short-term than ALB.

Price Growth

ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +13.91% price change this week, while EMN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +2.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALB is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

EMN is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.86% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALB($12.4B) has a higher market cap than EMN($7.2B). ALB has higher P/E ratio than EMN: ALB (33.94) vs EMN (8.82). ALB YTD gains are higher at: 24.893 vs. EMN (-29.093). EMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.73B vs. ALB (-281.58M). ALB has less debt than EMN: ALB (3.72B) vs EMN (5.13B). EMN has higher revenues than ALB: EMN (9.29B) vs ALB (4.99B).
ALBEMNALB / EMN
Capitalization12.4B7.2B172%
EBITDA-281.58M1.73B-16%
Gain YTD24.893-29.093-86%
P/E Ratio33.948.82385%
Revenue4.99B9.29B54%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.72B5.13B73%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALB vs EMN: Fundamental Ratings
ALB
EMN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
757
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
9555
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
764
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
288
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALB's Valuation (50) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as EMN (50) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

ALB's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as EMN (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

EMN's SMR Rating (55) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALB (95) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALB’s over the last 12 months.

ALB's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMN (64) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMN’s over the last 12 months.

ALB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for EMN (88) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew significantly faster than EMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALBEMN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QDTY45.410.54
+1.21%
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Cove CllStgyETF
SMN13.880.14
+1.02%
ProShares UltraShort Materials
EMGF58.400.40
+0.69%
iShares Em Mkts Eq Fac ETF
TDSB24.000.05
+0.21%
ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF
FLTB50.920.03
+0.06%
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF

EMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMN has been closely correlated with LYB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMN jumps, then LYB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMN
1D Price
Change %
EMN100%
-0.60%
LYB - EMN
73%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
HUN - EMN
73%
Closely correlated
+3.43%
DD - EMN
71%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
DOW - EMN
69%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
ASIX - EMN
66%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
More