Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALCBX vs RLBFX
ALCBX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ALCBX vs RLBFX
ALCBX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALCBX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALCBX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. ALCBX (15M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ALCBX: RLBFX (2.03) vs ALCBX (1.27). ALCBX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ALCBX (6 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). ALCBX (3.24) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. ALCBX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALCBX: RLBFX (250) vs ALCBX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. ALCBX (5.88). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. ALCBX (18.01).
| ALCBX | RLBFX | ALCBX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.30 | 617% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.24 | 0.30 | 1,080% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.301 | 8.705 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15M | 285B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 2.03 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.88 | 6.98 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.08 | 42.70 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.01 | 33.18 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.97 | 87.98 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement