This ALGT vs. ULCC stock comparison examines two small-cap airlines in the ultra-low-cost carrier segment, a niche sensitive to fuel prices, travel demand, and operational efficiency. Both companies cater to budget-conscious leisure travelers amid fluctuating market conditions, including post-pandemic recovery and economic uncertainties. Investors and traders tracking airline stocks for relative performance, sector rotation opportunities, or merger activity will find value in analyzing their business models, recent momentum, and risk profiles. This analysis highlights key contrasts to inform market positioning decisions in today's competitive landscape.
Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) operates as a leisure travel provider, offering nonstop flights from underserved small cities to popular vacation destinations using a fleet of Airbus and Boeing aircraft. The company supplements air services with ancillary revenues from baggage fees, seat assignments, and third-party products like hotels and car rentals. In recent market activity, ALGT shares have exhibited strong recovery, trading around $90 with a market capitalization (market cap) of about $1.67 billion and a 52-week range of $39.80 to $118. Sentiment has improved due to progress on its $1.5 billion acquisition of Sun Country Airlines (SNCY), securing U.S. DOT approval and antitrust clearance in recent weeks. This catalyst, alongside year-to-date gains of nearly 6% and over 100% in the past year, has driven buying interest despite negative earnings per share (EPS, a measure of profitability per share) of -$2.48 trailing twelve months (TTM).
Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC) runs a low-fare airline serving leisure passengers across the U.S. and Latin America with an all-Airbus fleet of 176 aircraft, emphasizing direct sales via websites and apps. Recent performance has been challenged, with shares hovering near $4.23, a market cap of roughly $972 million, and a 52-week range of $2.89 to $6.66. Pressures from rising fuel costs, quarterly revenue decline of 0.5% year-over-year, and EPS growth contraction of 1.9% have weighed on sentiment. Restructuring measures, such as deferring aircraft deliveries and terminating leases, aim to bolster liquidity amid TTM EPS of -$0.60 and operating margins of -9.63%. Year-to-date returns stand at about 10%, with 38% over the past year, reflecting volatility in the low-cost sector.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, tailored for copy trading across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—such as swing trading, trend following, and sector-specific plays—with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days. Standout performers show annualized returns ranging from +15% to +168%, win rates of 55% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and average trade durations of 1-10 days, often focusing on high-momentum sectors like semiconductors, energy, and industrials. While none currently target ALGT or ULCC directly, the platform's hundreds of bots cover thousands of tickers with varying risk profiles and styles. Explore these tools to align with current market conditions and enhance your trading edge.
In business models, ALGT emphasizes niche leisure routes from small markets, generating $2.61 billion in TTM revenue with ancillary focus, while ULCC pursues volume-driven low fares on a larger $3.72 billion revenue base. Growth drivers differ: ALGT leverages merger synergies for expansion, contrasting ULCC's cost-cutting amid negative free cash flow. Recent momentum favors ALGT with its forward price-to-earnings (P/E, price-to-earnings) ratio around 19 versus ULCC's 14, but ALGT trades at a premium price-to-sales of 0.63. Risk factors highlight ULCC's higher beta (market volatility measure) of 2.58 and debt load, versus ALGT's 1.63 beta. Sector exposure is similar in airlines, but market sentiment tilts toward ALGT on acquisition tailwinds.
Tickeron’s AI would currently favor ALGT over ULCC, based on stronger trend consistency, merger-related catalysts providing near-term uplift, and relatively better stability metrics like lower leverage and positive year-to-date momentum. While ULCC offers a lower valuation entry, its elevated risks temper probabilistic outperformance potential in prevailing conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALGT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileULCC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALGT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULCC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ALGT (@Airlines) experienced а +7.24% price change this week, while ULCC (@Airlines) price change was +8.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.01%.
ALGT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
ULCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.
| ALGT | ULCC | ALGT / ULCC | |
| Capitalization | 2.78B | 1.66B | 167% |
| EBITDA | 336M | -265M | -127% |
| Gain YTD | 19.784 | 51.592 | 38% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.91 | 11.48 | 156% |
| Revenue | 2.64B | 3.8B | 69% |
| Total Cash | 902M | 772M | 117% |
| Total Debt | 1.85B | 5.25B | 35% |
ALGT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ALGT | ULCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 21 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 86% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IQDF | 35.14 | 0.17 | +0.48% |
| FlexShares Intl Qual Div ETF | |||
| FTMN | 8.88 | N/A | +0.05% |
| Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF | |||
| NMAY | 29.48 | -0.05 | -0.16% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - May | |||
| BNOV | 47.69 | -0.11 | -0.22% |
| Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF Nov | |||
| PSET | 74.66 | -0.57 | -0.76% |
| Principal Quality ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALGT has been closely correlated with DAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALGT jumps, then DAL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALGT | 100% | +1.37% | ||
| DAL - ALGT | 76% Closely correlated | +2.07% | ||
| AAL - ALGT | 75% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| UAL - ALGT | 73% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| SNCY - ALGT | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| LUV - ALGT | 72% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULCC has been closely correlated with JBLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ULCC jumps, then JBLU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ULCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ULCC | 100% | -1.11% | ||
| JBLU - ULCC | 69% Closely correlated | -3.35% | ||
| ALGT - ULCC | 67% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| SNCY - ULCC | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DAL - ULCC | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.07% | ||
| UAL - ULCC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||