Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALGZX vs FFAFX
ALGZX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts ALGZX vs FFAFX
ALGZX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALGZX vs. FFAFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALGZX is a Buy and FFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. ALGZX (135M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than ALGZX: FFAFX (0.45) vs ALGZX (0.00). ALGZX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: ALGZX (10 years) vs FFAFX (6 years). ALGZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ALGZX (8.97). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALGZX: FFAFX (250) vs ALGZX (500000). ALGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.14 vs. FFAFX (0.40). ALGZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.02 vs. FFAFX (15.29).
| ALGZX | FFAFX | ALGZX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.34 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.34 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.710 | 9.280 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.14 | 0.40 | 1,292% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.11 | 44.24 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.02 | 15.29 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers