ALHC
Price
$15.05
Change
+$0.23 (+1.55%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.98B
74 days until earnings call
NEGXF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
19.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALHC vs NEGXF

Header iconALHC vs NEGXF Comparison
Open Charts ALHC vs NEGXFBanner chart's image
Alignment Healthcare
Price$15.05
Change+$0.23 (+1.55%)
Volume$5.19M
Capitalization2.98B
Nexgenrx
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization19.13M
ALHC vs NEGXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALHC vs. NEGXF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALHC is a Hold and NEGXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (ALHC: $15.05 vs. NEGXF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: ALHC and NEGXF are both not notable
ALHC represents the Publishing: Books/Magazines, while NEGXF is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALHC: 147% vs. NEGXF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ALHC: $2.98B vs. NEGXF: $19.13M
ALHC [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] is valued at $2.98B. NEGXF’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $19.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry ranges from $275.33B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $45.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry is $41.38B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALHC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEGXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NEGXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ALHC and NEGXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALHC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ALHC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ALHC (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +3.72% price change this week, while NEGXF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +4.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.10%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+4.60% weekly)

The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.

@Services to the Health Industry (+1.22% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALHC($2.98B) has a higher market cap than NEGXF($19.1M). ALHC YTD gains are higher at: 33.778 vs. NEGXF (0.000). NEGXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.39M vs. ALHC (1.54M). ALHC has more cash in the bank: 504M vs. NEGXF (1.9M). NEGXF has less debt than ALHC: NEGXF (508K) vs ALHC (330M). ALHC has higher revenues than NEGXF: ALHC (3.34B) vs NEGXF (16.8M).
ALHCNEGXFALHC / NEGXF
Capitalization2.98B19.1M15,602%
EBITDA1.54M2.39M64%
Gain YTD33.7780.000-
P/E RatioN/A54.59-
Revenue3.34B16.8M19,857%
Total Cash504M1.9M26,582%
Total Debt330M508K64,961%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NEGXF: Fundamental Ratings
NEGXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALHCNEGXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSSGX12.300.04
+0.33%
Fidelity SAI Sustainable Em Markets Eq
BFGFX50.740.10
+0.20%
Baron Focused Growth Retail
DHANX17.10N/A
N/A
Centre American Select Equity Investor
VADGX30.40N/A
N/A
Vanguard Advice Select Dividend Gr Admrl
SNXFX13.89-0.03
-0.25%
Schwab 1000 Index®

ALHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALHC has been loosely correlated with HUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALHC jumps, then HUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALHC
1D Price
Change %
ALHC100%
+1.55%
HUM - ALHC
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
ELV - ALHC
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.79%
CVS - ALHC
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
UNH - ALHC
34%
Loosely correlated
+11.98%
MOH - ALHC
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.92%
More

NEGXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NEGXF and ALHC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEGXF and ALHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEGXF
1D Price
Change %
NEGXF100%
N/A
ALHC - NEGXF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
OSCR - NEGXF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+6.54%
NEUE - NEGXF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-2.41%
PFHO - NEGXF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%