Advertisement
ALHC vs CVS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALHC is a Hold and CVS is a Buy.
CVS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ALHC | CVS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 58% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALHC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while CVS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ALHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CVS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALHC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ALHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CVS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ALHC (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +0.91% price change this week, while CVS (@Managed Health Care) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
ALHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
CVS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (-0.93% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
Advertisement
ALHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALHC has been loosely correlated with UNH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALHC jumps, then UNH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALHC | 100% | -5.15% | ||
| UNH - ALHC | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| CLOV - ALHC | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| HUM - ALHC | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| CVS - ALHC | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
| CI - ALHC | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
More | ||||
CVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVS has been closely correlated with UNH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CVS jumps, then UNH could also see price increases.