ALL
Price
$241.35
Change
+$1.74 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jun 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
62.14B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CNA
Price
$48.94
Change
+$0.58 (+1.20%)
Updated
Jun 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.24B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALL vs CNA

ALL vs CNA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? The Allstate Corporation (ALL) vs. CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • The Allstate Corporation (ALL) reported strong first-quarter 2026 earnings, with revenue of $16.9 billion and net income of $2.4 billion, driven by improved underwriting and lower catastrophe losses.
  • CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) trades at a higher price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 10.28 compared to ALL's 4.82, reflecting relative valuation differences amid upcoming earnings.
  • Both stocks exhibit low volatility with betas of 0.22 for ALL and 0.37 for CNA, appealing to stability-focused investors in the property and casualty insurance sector.
  • ALL boasts a significantly higher return on equity (ROE) of 45.22% versus CNA's 11.55%, highlighting efficiency in generating profits from shareholder equity.
  • Recent market activity shows ALL gaining from earnings momentum, while CNA approaches its 52-week high ahead of its earnings release.
  • Tickeron's AI trading bots offer strategies across sectors, with trending bots showing win rates up to 88% and annualized returns exceeding 100% in select portfolios.

Introduction

This comparison examines ALL and CNA, two prominent players in the property and casualty (P&C) insurance sector. Both companies provide essential coverage for auto, home, commercial, and specialty risks, making them relevant for investors seeking exposure to defensive financial services amid economic uncertainty. Traders monitoring relative performance may find value in their distinct scale, underwriting trends, and market positioning, particularly as catastrophe events and premium growth influence sector dynamics. This analysis draws on recent financial metrics and developments to highlight contrasts in momentum and stability.

ALL Overview and Recent Performance

The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is a leading P&C insurer offering personal lines like auto and homeowners insurance through brands such as Allstate and National General, alongside protection services. With a market capitalization of approximately $56 billion, it operates primarily in the U.S. and Canada. In recent weeks, ALL has shown positive price behavior, trading near $218 with year-to-date gains of 5.22% and one-year returns of 12.66%. Sentiment shifted upward following robust first-quarter 2026 results, featuring $16.9 billion in revenue and $2.4 billion in net income—a doubling from prior periods—fueled by strong underwriting margins, higher premiums, and reduced catastrophe losses. Analysts have raised price targets, with an average of $240, reflecting confidence in ongoing growth and a new $4 billion stock repurchase program.

CNA Overview and Recent Performance

CNA Financial Corporation (CNA), a subsidiary of Loews Corporation, focuses on commercial P&C insurance across specialty, commercial, international, and life segments, serving businesses with property, casualty, and professional liability products. Its market cap stands at about $13 billion. Over recent market activity, CNA has maintained steady performance around $48, with year-to-date returns of 6.30% and one-year gains of 8.49%. Shares have edged toward 52-week highs amid solid retention rates and new business growth, though prior-quarter earnings misses tempered enthusiasm. Investors note its value appeal, with Zacks ranking it a Buy, as first-quarter 2026 results loom on May 4, potentially influencing near-term sentiment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing bots curated from over 350 AI trading agents that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These virtual agents employ diverse strategies like trend following, dip buying, take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) corridors, and multi-ticker portfolios, tailored to current market conditions such as volatility in semiconductors, data centers, and industrials. Featured bots report impressive stats, including win rates from 51% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.70, annualized returns reaching +164% (e.g., volatility plays), and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 16 in select models with trade durations from hours to weeks. Ideal for traders seeking data-driven signals, this section highlights bots best suited for today's environment. Explore Trending AI Robots to deploy or copy these high-potential strategies.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both ALL and CNA operate in P&C insurance but differ in focus: ALL emphasizes consumer personal lines, while CNA leans toward commercial and specialty risks, exposing CNA more to business cycle fluctuations. Growth drivers include premium increases for both, though ALL benefits from broader scale ($68B TTM revenue vs. $15B) and superior quarterly growth (312% yoy EPS surge). Recent momentum favors ALL with post-earnings uplift (+3.8% monthly), outpacing CNA's +4.76% amid anticipation. Risk factors like catastrophe losses loom similarly, but ALL's lower debt/equity (23.72% vs. 27.44%) and higher ROE signal resilience. Market sentiment tilts toward ALL with optimistic analyst revisions, while CNA attracts value hunters at a discount to peers.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward ALL based on stronger trend consistency from recent earnings beats, elevated ROE, and positive analyst momentum, positioning it favorably relative to CNA's steadier but less dynamic profile ahead of earnings. Factors like reduced catastrophe impacts and buyback catalysts enhance ALL's probabilistic edge in the near term, though CNA remains viable for value-oriented stability.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ALL vs. CNA commentary
Jun 30, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALL is a StrongBuy and CNA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2026
Stock price -- (ALL: $241.38 vs. CNA: $48.95)
Brand notoriety: ALL and CNA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALL: 79% vs. CNA: 83%
Market capitalization -- ALL: $62.14B vs. CNA: $13.24B
ALL [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $62.14B. CNA’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $13.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $133.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $13.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALL’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileCNA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • CNA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALL is a better buy in the long-term than CNA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALL is a better buy in the short-term than CNA.

Price Growth

ALL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +8.46% price change this week, while CNA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +6.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +7.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

CNA is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+7.29% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALL($62.1B) has a higher market cap than CNA($13.2B). CNA has higher P/E ratio than ALL: CNA (10.24) vs ALL (4.92). ALL YTD gains are higher at: 17.165 vs. CNA (9.086). ALL has more cash in the bank: 5.4B vs. CNA (3.42B). CNA has less debt than ALL: CNA (2.97B) vs ALL (7.49B). ALL has higher revenues than CNA: ALL (67.6B) vs CNA (14.8B).
ALLCNAALL / CNA
Capitalization62.1B13.2B470%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.1659.086189%
P/E Ratio4.9210.2448%
Revenue67.6B14.8B457%
Total Cash5.4B3.42B158%
Total Debt7.49B2.97B252%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALL vs CNA: Fundamental Ratings
ALL
CNA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
928
SMR RATING
1..100
2579
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9777
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNA's Valuation (14) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (33) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNA (28) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to CNA’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's SMR Rating (25) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNA (79) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that ALL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNA’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNA (47) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to CNA’s over the last 12 months.

CNA's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (97) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALLCNA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAH84.670.16
+0.19%
Sonic Automotive
YUMC40.85N/A
N/A
Yum China Holdings
NTIC8.59N/A
N/A
Northern Technologies International Corp
KIDS20.30N/A
N/A
OrthoPediatrics Corp
CISS1.68N/A
N/A
C3is Inc.

ALL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALL has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALL jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALL
1D Price
Change %
ALL100%
+0.74%
HIG - ALL
81%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
PGR - ALL
69%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
TRV - ALL
68%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
THG - ALL
66%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
CB - ALL
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
More

CNA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNA has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNA jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNA
1D Price
Change %
CNA100%
+1.22%
HIG - CNA
80%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
L - CNA
80%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
AXS - CNA
75%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
AFG - CNA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
CINF - CNA
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
More