ALL
Price
$184.62
Change
-$0.63 (-0.34%)
Updated
Jan 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
45.51B
12 days until earnings call
L
Price
$83.93
Change
-$0.55 (-0.65%)
Updated
Jan 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.4B
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ALL vs L

Header iconALL vs L Comparison
Open Charts ALL vs LBanner chart's image
Allstate Corp (The)
Price$184.62
Change-$0.63 (-0.34%)
Volume$14.65K
Capitalization45.51B
Loews
Price$83.93
Change-$0.55 (-0.65%)
Volume$14.54K
Capitalization17.4B
ALL vs L Comparison Chart
Loading...
ALL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALL vs. L commentary
Jan 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALL is a Hold and L is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 24, 2025
Stock price -- (ALL: $184.66 vs. L: $83.93)
Brand notoriety: ALL and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALL: 131% vs. L: 87%
Market capitalization -- ALL: $45.51B vs. L: $17.4B
ALL [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $45.51B. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $17.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than ALL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than ALL.

Price Growth

ALL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.37% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALL is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

L is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.18% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALL($45.5B) has a higher market cap than L($17.4B). ALL has higher P/E ratio than L: ALL (40.00) vs L (12.32). L YTD gains are higher at: -0.897 vs. ALL (-4.217). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. ALL (5.87B). ALL has less debt than L: ALL (7.94B) vs L (9B). ALL has higher revenues than L: ALL (57.1B) vs L (15.7B).
ALLLALL / L
Capitalization45.5B17.4B261%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.217-0.897470%
P/E Ratio40.0012.32325%
Revenue57.1B15.7B364%
Total Cash5.87B45.2B13%
Total Debt7.94B9B88%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALL vs L: Fundamental Ratings
ALL
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1427
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1526
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5135
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9858
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (77). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (26). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's SMR Rating (98) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (98). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (51). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALL (98). This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ALL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LBRT22.730.56
+2.53%
Liberty Energy
GHLD12.790.19
+1.51%
Guild Holdings Company
EPM5.590.06
+1.08%
Evolution Petroleum Corp
CINF136.07-1.94
-1.41%
Cincinnati Financial Corp
EDUC1.59-0.05
-3.04%
Educational Development Corp

ALL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALL has been loosely correlated with PGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALL jumps, then PGR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALL
1D Price
Change %
ALL100%
-0.32%
PGR - ALL
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
L - ALL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
HIG - ALL
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
AXS - ALL
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
THG - ALL
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
More

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
-0.65%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
AXS - L
76%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
HIG - L
76%
Closely correlated
-0.60%
CINF - L
73%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
CB - L
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
More