Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALMZX vs FSMAX
ALMZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ALMZX vs FSMAX
ALMZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALMZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALMZX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. ALMZX (59M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ALMZX: FSMAX (0.50) vs ALMZX (0.00). ALMZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ALMZX (10 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). ALMZX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ALMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.15 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALMZX: FSMAX (0) vs ALMZX (500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.47 vs. ALMZX (21.81). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. ALMZX (-32.25).
| ALMZX | FSMAX | ALMZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.04 | 2,257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.04 | 3,029% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.149 | 15.556 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59M | 42.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.81 | 30.47 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.22 | 74.03 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.25 | 35.19 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 153.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement