Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALPAX vs RMEBX
ALPAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ALPAX vs RMEBX
ALPAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALPAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALPAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. ALPAX (2.9B). ALPAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: ALPAX (1.12) vs RMEBX (1.04). ALPAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ALPAX (26 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). ALPAX (1.09) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . ALPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALPAX: RMEBX (250) vs ALPAX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.14 vs. ALPAX (8.63). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. ALPAX (-1.44).
| ALPAX | RMEBX | ALPAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.07 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.07 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.305 | 6.444 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.9B | 117B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.04 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.63 | 10.14 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.11 | 34.54 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.44 | 35.62 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.53 | 94.57 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement