Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALPAX vs RMEBX
ALPAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ALPAX vs RMEBX
ALPAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALPAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALPAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ALPAX (2.91B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ALPAX: RMEBX (0.99) vs ALPAX (0.92). ALPAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ALPAX (26 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). ALPAX (1.09) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . ALPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALPAX: RMEBX (250) vs ALPAX (2500). ALPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.16 vs. RMEBX (7.37). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.55 vs. ALPAX (2.67).
| ALPAX | RMEBX | ALPAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.07 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.07 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.489 | 9.484 | 174% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.99 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | 7.37 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.70 | 36.25 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.67 | 33.55 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.96 | 88.62 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement