Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALPAX vs RMFCX
ALPAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ALPAX vs RMFCX
ALPAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALPAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALPAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. ALPAX (2.91B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ALPAX: RMFCX (1.19) vs ALPAX (1.12). ALPAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ALPAX (26 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). ALPAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ALPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALPAX: RMFCX (250) vs ALPAX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. ALPAX (7.72). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. ALPAX (-5.38).
| ALPAX | RMFCX | ALPAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.91 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.91 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.789 | 5.845 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 115B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.19 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.72 | 10.10 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.63 | 34.65 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.38 | 33.85 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.71 | 91.46 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers