Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALSMX vs RGACX
ALSMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ALSMX vs RGACX
ALSMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALSMX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSMX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. ALSMX (19.6M). ALSMX pays higher dividends than RGACX: ALSMX (0.13) vs RGACX (0.00). ALSMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ALSMX (7 years) vs RGACX (24 years). ALSMX (1.67) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). ALSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.17 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALSMX: RGACX (250) vs ALSMX (2500). ALSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.75 vs. RGACX (-0.53). ALSMX return over 5 years is better than : 36.12 vs. RGACX (10.82).
| ALSMX | RGACX | ALSMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.93 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.93 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.066 | 8.819 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.6M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.75 | -0.53 | -2,401% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.02 | 40.68 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.12 | 10.82 | 334% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement