ALTI
Price
$3.08
Change
+$0.26 (+9.22%)
Updated
Apr 9, 02:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
402.22M
FHI
Price
$35.84
Change
-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Updated
Apr 9, 02:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.04B
15 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ALTI vs FHI

Header iconALTI vs FHI Comparison
Open Charts ALTI vs FHIBanner chart's image
AlTi Global
Price$3.08
Change+$0.26 (+9.22%)
Volume$860
Capitalization402.22M
Federated Hermes
Price$35.84
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.04B
ALTI vs FHI Comparison Chart
Loading...
ALTI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALTI vs. FHI commentary
Apr 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALTI is a Hold and FHI is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ALTI: $2.82 vs. FHI: $35.85)
Brand notoriety: ALTI and FHI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALTI: 82% vs. FHI: 86%
Market capitalization -- ALTI: $402.22M vs. FHI: $3.04B
ALTI [@Investment Managers] is valued at $402.22M. FHI’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALTI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFHI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALTI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FHI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the long-term than ALTI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALTI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALTI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FHI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the short-term than ALTI.

Price Growth

ALTI (@Investment Managers) experienced а -10.76% price change this week, while FHI (@Investment Managers) price change was -12.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -6.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALTI is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2022.

FHI is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-6.20% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHI($3.04B) has a higher market cap than ALTI($402M). ALTI has higher P/E ratio than FHI: ALTI (30.86) vs FHI (10.61). FHI YTD gains are higher at: -12.104 vs. ALTI (-36.054). FHI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 451M vs. ALTI (-284.8M). FHI has more cash in the bank: 561M vs. ALTI (15.3M). ALTI has less debt than FHI: ALTI (242M) vs FHI (458M). FHI has higher revenues than ALTI: FHI (1.61B) vs ALTI (251M).
ALTIFHIALTI / FHI
Capitalization402M3.04B13%
EBITDA-284.8M451M-63%
Gain YTD-36.054-12.104298%
P/E Ratio30.8610.61291%
Revenue251M1.61B16%
Total Cash15.3M561M3%
Total Debt242M458M53%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHI: Fundamental Ratings
FHI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
40
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALTIFHI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ALTI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRARX43.13N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity R3
BPTIX164.83N/A
N/A
Baron Partners Institutional
AGORX8.38N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Global Gr R
GGGIX52.44N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Growth I
CVLFX11.97-0.12
-0.99%
Cullen Value C

FHI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHI has been loosely correlated with VRTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FHI jumps, then VRTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHI
1D Price
Change %
FHI100%
-0.77%
VRTS - FHI
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.72%
APAM - FHI
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
SEIC - FHI
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
AMG - FHI
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
PFG - FHI
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.92%
More