Autoliv Inc. (ALV) and Aptiv PLC (APTV) are key players in the automotive supply chain, navigating shifts toward safety and electrification. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning in the current environment of moderating vehicle production and tech-driven innovation. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing auto sector recovery will find value in understanding their relative strengths, such as earnings momentum versus growth potential, to inform portfolio decisions amid ongoing industry headwinds.
Autoliv Inc. (ALV) is a global leader in passive automotive safety systems, including airbags, seatbelts, and steering wheel components, serving major OEMs worldwide. In recent market activity, ALV shares have climbed toward the upper end of their 52-week range ($86–$130), closing around $121 with year-to-date gains of 3%. Strong Q1 2026 results, featuring 7% net sales growth to nearly $2.8 billion and adjusted EPS of $2.05 beating estimates, drove an 11%+ surge, supported by robust Asia demand and operational efficiencies. Sentiment has shifted positively on margin expansion to 8.9% and record cash flow outlook, offsetting softer global light vehicle production. Analysts maintain buy ratings with targets implying further upside.
Aptiv PLC (APTV) specializes in advanced vehicle technologies, including electrification, ADAS, and connectivity solutions, positioning it for the EV (electric vehicle) transition. Shares trade near $61 within a 52-week range of $52–$89, with year-to-date performance up 20% but a 12.5% pullback over recent weeks amid broader market rotations. Preparations for the Versigent spin-off (electrical distribution systems) and Q1 earnings anticipation have influenced volatility, with mixed news on acquisitions and cost pressures. Revenue stands at $20.4 billion TTM (trailing twelve months), but elevated P/E reflects tempered EPS growth. Analyst targets average $88, signaling optimism for long-term catalysts despite near-term consolidation.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available models that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots employ varied approaches like swing trading, trend following, dip buying, and multi-agent systems, with impressive stats including annualized returns from 15.50% to 167.82%, win rates of 53.91%–87.72%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Timeframes range from 5-minute to 55-day holds, targeting sectors such as semiconductors, energy, and industrials. Only the most suitable for prevailing conditions earn a spot, offering copy-trading signals with risk management like TP/SL (take-profit/stop-loss) corridors. Explore these bots to enhance your trading edge in dynamic markets.
ALV ($9B market cap) and APTV ($15B) both expose investors to automotive OEM demand but differ in focus: ALV’s stable passive safety benefits from volume recovery, while APTV’s growth drivers hinge on EV/ADAS adoption amid slower electrification ramps. Recent momentum favors ALV post-earnings, contrasting APTV’s pullback; ALV’s lower P/E and higher EPS stability reduce risk versus APTV’s premium valuation. Sector risks like supply chain issues and LVP (light vehicle production) fluctuations affect both, but ALV shows resilient margins while APTV leverages spin-off focus. Sentiment tilts toward ALV’s consistency amid APTV’s transitional phase.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward ALV based on superior recent trend consistency, earnings-driven momentum, and attractive valuation relative to APTV’s higher volatility and pre-earnings positioning. Factors like margin stability and regional sales strength bolster ALV’s near-term edge, though APTV holds longer-term potential from tech catalysts. This probabilistic assessment favors monitoring both for relative outperformance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAPTV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while APTV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.76% price change this week, while APTV (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.54%.
ALV is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2026.
APTV is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| ALV | APTV | ALV / APTV | |
| Capitalization | 9.62B | 14.4B | 67% |
| EBITDA | 1.48B | 2.21B | 67% |
| Gain YTD | 9.949 | 5.575 | 178% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.84 | 40.51 | 34% |
| Revenue | 11B | 20.7B | 53% |
| Total Cash | 342M | 3.17B | 11% |
| Total Debt | 2.25B | 9.89B | 23% |
ALV | APTV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 18 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ALV's Valuation (9) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APTV (73). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than APTV’s over the last 12 months.
ALV's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APTV (100). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than APTV’s over the last 12 months.
ALV's SMR Rating (34) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APTV (88). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than APTV’s over the last 12 months.
APTV's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as ALV (45). This means that APTV’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.
APTV's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALV (45). This means that APTV’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALV’s over the last 12 months.
| ALV | APTV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 54% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APTV has been loosely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APTV jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APTV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APTV | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| ALV - APTV | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| LEA - APTV | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| MGA - APTV | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| THRM - APTV | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| VC - APTV | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
More | ||||