Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALZFX vs RGEBX
ALZFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts ALZFX vs RGEBX
ALZFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALZFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALZFX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. ALZFX (7.29B). ALZFX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ALZFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: ALZFX (14 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than ALZFX (0.66). ALZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 134.46 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALZFX: RGEBX (250) vs ALZFX (500000). ALZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.11 vs. RGEBX (3.42). ALZFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.87 vs. RGEBX (12.32).
| ALZFX | RGEBX | ALZFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.08 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.08 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.381 | 6.888 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.29B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.11 | 3.42 | 880% |
| Returns for 3 years | 145.60 | 36.26 | 401% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.87 | 12.32 | 762% |
| Returns for 10 years | 418.05 | 93.96 | 445% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement