Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMAGX vs CGFAX
AMAGX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts AMAGX vs CGFAX
AMAGX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMAGX vs. CGFAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAGX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. AMAGX (6.84B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than AMAGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs AMAGX (0.00). AMAGX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: AMAGX (32 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). AMAGX (0.86) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AMAGX (3.00). AMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: AMAGX (100) vs CGFAX (250). AMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.49 vs. CGFAX (14.80). AMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 81.08 vs. CGFAX (25.03).
| AMAGX | CGFAX | AMAGX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.404 | 10.432 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.84B | 338B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.49 | 14.80 | 260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.19 | 53.03 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.08 | 25.03 | 324% |
| Returns for 10 years | 239.32 | 117.58 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers