Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMAGX vs CGFAX
AMAGX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts AMAGX vs CGFAX
AMAGX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMAGX vs. CGFAX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAGX is a Hold and CGFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. AMAGX (6.69B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than AMAGX: CGFAX (0.23) vs AMAGX (0.00). AMAGX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: AMAGX (33 years) vs CGFAX (25 years). AMAGX (0.86) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AMAGX (12.00). AMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: AMAGX (100) vs CGFAX (250). AMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.41 vs. CGFAX (2.05). AMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 53.50 vs. CGFAX (13.34).
| AMAGX | CGFAX | AMAGX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.727 | 9.862 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.69B | 342B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.41 | 2.05 | 1,047% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.14 | 43.94 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.50 | 13.34 | 401% |
| Returns for 10 years | 228.10 | 111.92 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement