Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMAGX vs GFACX
AMAGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts AMAGX vs GFACX
AMAGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMAGX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAGX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. AMAGX (6.84B). AMAGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . AMAGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: AMAGX (32 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than AMAGX (0.86). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AMAGX (3.00). AMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: AMAGX (100) vs GFACX (250). AMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.49 vs. GFACX (12.09). AMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 81.08 vs. GFACX (14.79).
| AMAGX | GFACX | AMAGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.35 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.35 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.404 | 10.104 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.84B | 338B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.49 | 12.09 | 318% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.19 | 44.36 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.08 | 14.79 | 548% |
| Returns for 10 years | 239.32 | 88.17 | 271% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement