Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMAGX vs GFACX
AMAGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts AMAGX vs GFACX
AMAGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMAGX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAGX is a Hold and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. AMAGX (6.69B). AMAGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . AMAGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: AMAGX (33 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than AMAGX (0.86). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AMAGX (12.00). AMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: AMAGX (100) vs GFACX (250). AMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.41 vs. GFACX (-0.37). AMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 53.50 vs. GFACX (4.07).
| AMAGX | GFACX | AMAGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.35 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.35 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.727 | 9.331 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.69B | 342B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.41 | -0.37 | -5,856% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.14 | 35.81 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.50 | 4.07 | 1,313% |
| Returns for 10 years | 228.10 | 83.31 | 274% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement